Get your wallets out, folks!!

Here's a little perspective:LivePsy wrote: On the other hand, $35,000 now is more affordable to me than the brand new price was back in '74...
Inflation is not even the half of it. Lower wages, no credit, very hard to get loans... How hard was it for you to get $3,500 together in 1974 compared to $35,000 now? Considering the wage you were earning then and now (and personal hardships aside) I would say that for most of us, that 1974 Moog was an unreachable dream and this $35,000 is by no means cheap but could be borrowed and paid off over years. Its easy to forget how little money people earned and how ridiculously expensive synths were.Trigger wrote:Here's a little perspective:LivePsy wrote: On the other hand, $35,000 now is more affordable to me than the brand new price was back in '74...
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, $3495.00USD (list price for a Sys 15 in 1974) adjusted for inflation in today's dollars would sell for $15,842. So where does the other $20K come from? Does a Moog modular (even a later model in apparently decent shape) really command that kind of price? I guess all it takes is one buyer with enough motivation.
It'll be interesting to see how this shakes out...
I can confirm it in one or two cases, and there's also the independent testimony of people like Richard Lawson of RL Music in Britain, who until recently was selling lovingly reconditioned synths at very high prices and getting the money. He sold an MS20 of mine, giving me a realistic price for the instrument I sold to him (the price I asked him for, in fact) and then re-selling it for a very high price once he'd restored it. The price it sold for was absurd, but why not if that's what someone wanted to pay?this_poison wrote:I just wish there was a way to confirm the cash actually changed hands!