is there anyone who actually likes the name?

In a Moog Mood? Here's a forum for discussion of general Moog topics.

is there anyone who actually likes the name?

yes
8
19%
sorry, but no
28
67%
maybe it will grow on me
6
14%
 
Total votes: 42

Jords
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:03 pm

Post by Jords » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:32 pm

Boeing 737-400 wrote:Yeah, is that going to be the actual name? Have they confirmed it anywhere?
Quoting Amos on AH:

'Have a sense of humour!
If the most beautiful girl you had ever seen in your life asked you out, and
she happened to have a very silly name, would you treat her badly just
because of that?

Anyway, the name is anti-hip... named by a clever and ironic individual in
an attempt to convey old-skool flavor, with a bit of postmodern
self-referential self-deprecation. And spliffs. Think about it: Moog is a
company entering the 21st century with an analog, voltage controlled
monosynth... how "not with-it" is that? And yet it's really cool. So too
with the name... a dated term of cool, said with a wink and a grin.

When all is said and done, and you have seen and heard the beauty of this
synth, then go ahead if you like and say that you will boycott Moog forever
because of a silly name. I say, don't take yourself too seriously and all
will be well. So the name doesn't awe you with its grandeur. When you're
playing it it won't even matter...'

and, in response to my asking if it was the real name or a working title:

'That's the name. Little Phatty.

Haaahahahahahahahahahaha!

really.

We think it's funny on several levels...

I hope it grows on you.'

Of course, he might just have been playing with us... :wink:

martin
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by martin » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:39 pm

Farttron 123
yup! badass bass all the way! let rip! that's where i'm putting my bottom dollar!

:wink:

Impossible Sound
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Northeast USA

Post by Impossible Sound » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:45 pm

It's not funny, ironic, post-modern, or anti-hip. It's just plain stupid.

Will that prevent me from buying one? Probably not, but the name will enter my personal lexicon of words never to cross my lips.

User avatar
museslave
Posts: 590
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 1:52 pm
Location: Asheville
Contact:

Words are important!

Post by museslave » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:56 pm

Jords wrote: Quoting Amos on AH:

'Have a sense of humour!
If the most beautiful girl you had ever seen in your life asked you out, and
she happened to have a very silly name, would you treat her badly just
because of that?
That's a superduper metaphor... except for the fact that I didn't make the girl, and didn't have the opportunity to name her something suitable, or at least cool. If we're going to take this metaphor... then it is Moog who named their beautiful daughter "Big Fatass," (despite having the chance to name her anything) and hope we accept her for her more pleasant qualities. ; )
Anyway, the name is anti-hip... named by a clever and ironic individual

I'm all for cleverness and irony... but... um... companies spend a great deal of money trying to market their work... why would it be clever or ironic or most importantly FINANCIALLY VIABLE to name a product something you know most people are going to be displeased with?
an attempt to convey old-skool flavor, with a bit of postmodern
self-referential self-deprecation.

It's not :::ahem::: old-skool. Those words are still very much in use...
Why would a VERY high quality synthesizer... the most prized brand ever... need to be self-deprecating? You don't see... I don't know... Lexus... calling their next car "Piece of Sh*t," or Korg releasing a keyboard called "Doesn't work very well, but is shiny."
Think about it: Moog is a
company entering the 21st century with an analog, voltage controlled
monosynth... how "not with-it" is that?

:::blink gormlessly for a moment::: What? Is he serious? I can't think of anything MORE "with-it..." which is why they can charge high prices... and why their product is purchased by amateurs and professionals alike. There's a REASON you see Voyagers on stage with all of the biggest stars. How could anyone think Moog isn't with-it? People buy Moogs simply because of the NAME!
When all is said and done, and you have seen and heard the beauty of this
synth, then go ahead if you like and say that you will boycott Moog forever
because of a silly name.
Um... don't you think that's a little hyperbolic? Like perhaps a little defensively hyperbolic? No one is going to stop using Moogs because of a poor naming choice, and everyone should know that.
I say, don't take yourself too seriously and all
will be well. So the name doesn't awe you with its grandeur. When you're
playing it it won't even matter...'
I say the most historically important, revered, and quality synth company might do well to take itself a little MORE seriously.
And how I feel about the name while I'm playing it will depend very much on whether its name is emblazoned on the back for my audience to see. ; )
We think it's funny on several levels...
Well, I hope what levels those are will be portrayed in the manual for the rest of us to appreciate them. ; )
I hope it grows on you.'
Did he really close it with a penis pun???


Woww.
www.youtube.com/user/automaticgainsay
www.myspace.com/automaticgainsay2
www.myspace.com/godfreyscordialmusic

JSRockit
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: Jersey

Post by JSRockit » Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:57 pm

Man, people are too damn sensitive over the name... that may not even be the finished name... relax.

User avatar
MC
Posts: 2925
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Secluded Tranquil Tropical Country

Post by MC » Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:27 pm

JSRockit wrote:Man, people are too damn sensitive over the name... that may not even be the finished name... relax.
Yeah, and everybody's an expert on a synth that hasn't even been released yet.

Two more days...

godzilla
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:00 am
Location: Australia

Post by godzilla » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:08 am

come on think back to 1 year ago

if some crazy magician came up to you and said:

magician "i will make it so that moog will release a cool synth that you can afford, but at a price, what say you?"

you "anything, anything, ah wait hang on what price?"

magician "it will have a bleep name"

you "ah, sure"

magician "it shall be done"

you "yay"



be thankfull for what you've got.
they could call it "the moog penis" and i'd probab... ok that might be too much yeah little phatty is a really bad name isn't it, but i haven't lost my resolve i don't care what it's called

i'm just going to refer to it as the LP

CTRLSHFT
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: boulder, co
Contact:

Post by CTRLSHFT » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:56 am

i'm turning a blind eye until the official announcement. ::fingers crossed for non-retardation::
www.ctrlshft.com

Jords
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:03 pm

Re: Words are important!

Post by Jords » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:43 am

Muselave wrote:
When all is said and done, and you have seen and heard the beauty of this
synth, then go ahead if you like and say that you will boycott Moog forever
because of a silly name.
Um... don't you think that's a little hyperbolic? Like perhaps a little defensively hyperbolic? No one is going to stop using Moogs because of a poor naming choice, and everyone should know that.
Oops - in fairness to Amos, I should have mentioned that these comments, while on a public list, were adressed in the first instance to someone who actually did say they would stop using moogs if this turned out to be the full name. Obviously that is drama-queenery of the first water.

Jords
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:03 pm

Post by Jords » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:54 am

MC wrote:Yeah, and everybody's an expert on a synth that hasn't even been released yet.
It's called speculation. It's fun. Even the un-informed guesswork bits. 'Wait and see' is fine, but would you rather in the meantime everyone refrained from discussing the thing at all? That would be boring.

martin
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by martin » Tue Mar 28, 2006 6:37 am

on second thought, the little phatty name isn't so terrible. my last name means 'lard', believe it or not. whenever kids used to tease me in school, they'd get a paragraph in my big book of memories. or a whopping, whatever was more appropriate...
:wink:
having a funny name teaches you to be resilient. whatever the name of the new thing will be, doesn't matter if it works well and sounds evil.
:twisted:
nyaah-nyaah

EricK
Posts: 6015
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:09 pm

Post by EricK » Tue Mar 28, 2006 7:57 am

I always associated the Moog name to be a distinction of class above all other brands. THe quality of the instruments that they produce in my opinion is unmatched.

If you look back at the craftsmanship and the suality of the sound that comes out of them, you know that it isn't a second rate company.

I don't know of too many other people where i live that owns a Moog or even has a faint idea about them. Even people who I would think were musically knowledgable have no clue about Moog.
I think that a name like "Little Phatty" is obviously marketed to a certian age bracket as a means of introducing them to the product line.

ANyway I think that the name sucks. I don't really see how it could be called Little Phatty if it doesn't go all the way down to 32 in octaves.
Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://moogfoundation.org/do-something-2/donate/

I think I hear the mothership coming.

martin
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by martin » Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:59 am

i'd like to see that LP thing...

Modularfan
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 2:51 pm

Post by Modularfan » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:19 am

EricK wrote: I think that the name sucks.
I'm not picking on EricK here, but I can't help wondering why those who don't like the name 'Little Phatty' don't seem to have a problem with 'MoogerFooger', a name which is even LESS descriptive of the gear than 'LP'.
EricK wrote:I don't really see how it could be called Little Phatty if it doesn't go all the way down to 32 in octaves.
Well, the spec does say that the LP has Octave Up/Down buttons...

MF

godzilla
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:00 am
Location: Australia

Post by godzilla » Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:31 am

i never really liked the name moogerfooger, i allways thought it was cheese (they should have called them "foot modules")
but they are awesome units, so there is no point in really saying anything bad about them because of their name, same with the new synth
but little phatty is a lot worse than moogerfooger.

yeah i don't think it will be called Little Phatty, ah well we'll find out in another 12 hrs anyway, more or less.

Post Reply