
I wonder if Moog could in someway license the design for a new poly using the chips and boards from the A6 to save on costs??
Thoughts??
This is not a bad idea at all. I used to have an Andy, it's got a sound of its' own and at the same time I still think it can approximate the vintage analogs. The 'Moog factor' in those oscillators is pretty big (IIRC, they're based on Moog Modular oscs), and that comes from a Model D owner... An 8-voice multitimbral "Moogdromeda" focusing on the 'Moogish' side of the sound would work well, IMHO. Less features, smaller size a'la the P'08, wooden end caps, all knobs Moog style - I might just buy that. I never understood why Alesis never developed the concept, a slimmed down 8-voice Andromeda and a rack might have worked very well...goldphinga wrote:I wonder if Moog could in someway license the design for a new poly using the chips and boards from the A6 to save on costs??
I'd have bought two such rackmounts in a heartbeat...MC wrote:A rackmount eight voice A6 was in the works. Alesis dropped development of Andromeda derivatives after they were acquired by Numark. Many people left the company and there are very few of the A6 team still working at Alesis. That left an "orphaned" product that continues to be manufactured ten years later.
True dat - the filters on the Andy are trying to be everything. The 12 dB filter was nice, but the 24 dB could be improved. Perhaps the existing chips could be tweaked..?MC wrote:As for a Moog polyphonic made from A6 chips... I'd welcome the ASO chips (oscillators) but not the ASF chips (filters). The moog filter in the A6 is a bit lacking although the oberheim filter is pretty good. Plus I'd rather have better sounding VCAs - the A6 VCAs are a little too sterile.
MC wrote:The old Oberheim polysynths had OTA VCAs that distorted wonderfully. SEM, OB-X, and OB-SX had OTA VCAs and voice audio summers. OB-Xa had OTA VCAs but a CEM3360 for the voice summer. The OTAs were pushed hard enough that they operated in non-linear land which introduces distortion - that distinct Oberheim creaminess. When the OB-8 replaced the OTAs with ultralinear CEM3360 VCAs, Tom Oberheim thought something had been lost. Few would argue with him.
I wonder why that evil Numark company has never hired someone of the software developers back (or a new one) to make a new OS.. After all they have milked the A6 for long enough, right? It pisses me off when I see products like the Virus series, repackaged over and over again and everyone goes nuts when a new repackaged Virus comes out. Access however have been listening to their customers and they have provided them with plenty of new features and fixes. Why not Numark? I don't understand how is it THAT difficult to do this.MC wrote:A rackmount eight voice A6 was in the works. Alesis dropped development of Andromeda derivatives after they were acquired by Numark. Many people left the company and there are very few of the A6 team still working at Alesis. That left an "orphaned" product that continues to be manufactured ten years later.
Yeah!!The Analog Organist wrote:Numark committed the unpardonable sin of allowing a classic analog synthesizer to die before it had been perfected. I gladly would have handed over $3,000 for an Andromeda IF the company had corrected the instrument's problems and provided the sort of service that DSI provides.