The P08 and Voyager are clean sounding, and rather sophisticated instruments. The P5 (Rev 3 and above) and the Mini D are raw sounding, and rather simplistic. But sometimes, simplicity and boldness is exactly what one is looking for...

No prob it just bugs me when I see misinformation spread around. You'd think the internets would help spread valid info around but it seems to have the opposite effect more often than not.Voltor07 wrote:Oh...that's right, actually. Sorry, my bad. I'll shut up now.dougt wrote:
That's because you don't have the facts correct. The Rev 3 P-5 used CEM3340 VCOs and CEM3320 VCFs. The P-08 has DCOs and PA397 (basically a surface mount version of the CEM3396 Dual Wave Processor which was a low-cost chip containing a 4-pole filter, waveshaper, mixer, and VCAs used in the Matrix-6/1000)...
Done.dougt wrote: Maybe if you would delete your previous post it would help...
Actually it helps spreading information -bad or good.dougt wrote:You'd think the internets would help spread valid info around but it seems to have the opposite effect more often than not.
haha- add it to the pileBoy, this discussion got complicated.
amen sister!Some of those vintage synths are of course completely irreplaceable and an absolute joy to play and use, but upon hearing a piece of music, what keyboard is being played is generally a trivial question.
Pads only??Voltor07 wrote:I will give the P08 credit in the pads area. It puts out some real nice pads. I just can't justify spending 2k on a pads-only machine.
Lemme put it another way, as I meant no disrespect to the P08.DocT wrote:
Pads only??