Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Everything Phatty.
dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by dan thacker » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:46 am

I'm happy there won't be a pathetic screen with presets,it also keeps the price down.If you want that sort of feature,get a soft synth.,what the What hell is a "fanboy"?

User avatar
Assar
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Assar » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:17 pm

dan thacker wrote:I'm happy there won't be a pathetic screen with presets,it also keeps the price down.If you want that sort of feature,get a soft synth.,what the What hell is a "fanboy"?
Good for you. Really. I'm not being sarcastic. Promise.
But it prevents me from buying it. Unfortunately, because I think I really would love it with a patch memory.

A fanboy is someone who is 100% loyal and 200% enthusiastic about everything that a manufacturer does or puts out on the market. No critical mind, no analysing, always defending it from what have a slightest chance to be interpreted as criticism. Apple fanboys are often called iTards. I am not a fanboy. I really love Moog stuff, but I have my analysing mind intact and I use it. And I don't question other peoples needs or wants based on my own views. We are all different. Well, most of us ... :wink:
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Phatty TE #1045 | Etherwave Theremin
Stockholm, Sweden - - - Listen at: assar.se

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
muksys
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:05 am
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by muksys » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:00 pm

http://youtu.be/YqMfld138bM

btw Assar, for what it's worth, Cyril did mention at NAMM that there will be a dedicated editor for storing presets.

dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by dan thacker » Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:22 pm

I certainly am not a fan boy.There are things about my synth that I don't like,but I for the most part do like it.
And I'm still waiting for my sticker dammit!-see,there you go,look at my insolence directed at Moog.I'm loyal to no one, except my girlfriend and breaking bad.

User avatar
_DemonDan_
Posts: 1273
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:52 pm

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by _DemonDan_ » Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:31 am

dan thacker wrote:And I'm still waiting for my sticker dammit!
PM me a mailing address and I'll send you one of mine.
I picked up a couple at NAMM.

They also had smaller stickers that said:

MOOG
All Your Bass Are Belong To Us
_ :twisted: _DemonDan_ :twisted: _

User avatar
Assar
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Assar » Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:53 am

"-Oh, my new butler Ingemar!" (swedish name) :D
muksys wrote:btw Assar, for what it's worth, Cyril did mention at NAMM that there will be a dedicated editor for storing presets.
Sounds good. It will propably work well for studio situations but less good live.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Phatty TE #1045 | Etherwave Theremin
Stockholm, Sweden - - - Listen at: assar.se

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
muksys
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:05 am
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by muksys » Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:06 pm

Assar wrote: Sounds good. It will propably work well for studio situations but less good live.
Yeah, if you don't use a laptop already live, would be silly to incorporate one for just the Minitaur.

EMwhite
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:22 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by EMwhite » Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:12 pm

Some people HAVE TO have laptops as part of their rig. Depend on it. Some can't stand it.

Nice thing about the Minitaur is that it has conventional DIN Midi in so you don't need it. Less and less of the devices out there are doing that and there is no low cost way to connect a type B USB to a conventional Midi DIN keyboard. Despite the real estate required for the DIN and the somewhat antiquated (slow) nature of conventional protocal I'm really really glad Moog went this way while providing USB also. Very smart.
'76 Minimoog, Taurus 3, Oberheim FVS + Son of 2-voice; Sequential ProOne; Juno 106; Moog Model 15; Kurzweil 250; Hammond M3; and a handful of Fender Basses Flickr!

Phurniture
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:01 am

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Phurniture » Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:07 am

I wonder if it would be possible to implement the Minitaur's note-sync feature into the Phattys?
Mood Lighting EP, the debut from Phurniture on Spliced Vinyl Recordings
Buy it now on Beatport

User avatar
stiiiiiiive
Posts: 2621
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by stiiiiiiive » Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:11 am

Phurniture wrote:I hope it will be possible to implement the Minitaur's note-sync feature into the Phattys
I've corrected that for you ;)

User avatar
Assar
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Assar » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:03 am

stiiiiiiive wrote:I hope the Minitaur's note-sync feature will be implemented into the Phattys!"
Dito! :wink:
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Phatty TE #1045 | Etherwave Theremin
Stockholm, Sweden - - - Listen at: assar.se

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Vitja
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:14 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Vitja » Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:11 pm

Yes! Note Sync!
That is (for me) the biggest problem about Phatty!
Gear:Slim Phatty, Arturia Minibrute, Casio MT-600, MF-101,MF-102,MF104Z,MP-201,CP-251,Ibanez John Scofield, PRS custom 24, circuit bent Kawai R-100,Circuit Bent Roland TR-505, Boss Dr55, Akai MPK 25, Ensoniq DP/4, RME Fireface 800, tons of guitar effects.

enossified
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 9:13 am

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by enossified » Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:18 am

Assar wrote:Are you missing my point or is it just fanboy reactions?
I think Moog was thinking about how people work with DAWs these days. The Minitaur editor is a VST so the DAW project saves your patches for you rather than memory in the synth.

It does mean there are no presets in traditional MIDI applications, though.

nectarios
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:54 pm

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by nectarios » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:08 pm

Note sync is extremely important in the type of music I make. The different clicks and transient content I get from my Slim Phatty, means a slight pain of selecting the "good" notes in a bassline riff that extends for more than 2 bars.

Even if they sort that out on the SP, I do feel that the saw and square VCO output is quite different to the SP ones.

I do think that it is quite expensive for what it is, but it sounds so damn good that I have to have one.

I am delighted with my SP, MF-102 and MF-108M. They all ooze quality with every tweak.
I am no Moog fanboy, but I am quickly becoming one and have no problem admitting it :D

Peace out.
Eurorack, 5U, x0xb0x, Moog Slim Phatty, MF-102, MF-103, MF-108, CP-251, Beatstep Pro, Nord Lead 1, NI Maschine, MXR-104, ProCo RAT2, Big Muff π Bass, Logic Pro 9.
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts

User avatar
Assar
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Contact:

Re: Minitaur vs. Slim Phatty

Post by Assar » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:48 pm

nectarios wrote:I am no Moog fanboy, but I am quickly becoming one and have no problem admitting it :D
Fanboyism is ok as long it is based on quality judgement, and not on brand admiration ...
:wink:
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Phatty TE #1045 | Etherwave Theremin
Stockholm, Sweden - - - Listen at: assar.se

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Post Reply