Ideas for the Little Phatty Stage III?

Everything Phatty.
User avatar
Assar
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Contact:

Post by Assar » Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:47 am

CTRLSHFT wrote:
anoteoftruth wrote:Oh I love the idea of a limited edition of reversed keys. They'd be rad.
Sounds like a relatively easy factory mod to offer. :)
Sounds like a very expensive mod to offer, considering the number of buyers that would be willing to pay for it ... I guess.
:wink:
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Little Phatty TE #1045 | Etherwave Theremin
Stockholm, Sweden - - - Listen at: assar.se

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

jgirv
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:01 am

Post by jgirv » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:36 am

...very true.. the organ builders most often "cut their own" out of the stock wood, then apply the veneer tops... it's a work of art, to be sure. They last forever and age nicely...

CTRLSHFT
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: boulder, co
Contact:

Post by CTRLSHFT » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:27 pm

Assar wrote:
CTRLSHFT wrote:
anoteoftruth wrote:Oh I love the idea of a limited edition of reversed keys. They'd be rad.
Sounds like a relatively easy factory mod to offer. :)
Sounds like a very expensive mod to offer, considering the number of buyers that would be willing to pay for it ... I guess.
:wink:
Maybe not cheap, but I imagine if they can get a reliable source for the inverted boards swapping them out with the existing one might not be all that tough, maybe an hour of work. ::shrug::
www.ctrlshft.com

Chris Rimby
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:53 am

Post by Chris Rimby » Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:57 pm

Maskin wrote:Not sure if this is mentioned before (I suppose it has) but I would be happy with voice expanders in 1U rack format instead of a new version of the Little Phatty. I own 2 LPs but there's no way I would buy 6 more to have 8 voice polyphony. I probably would buy 6 voice expanders.
Absolutely. I really, really hope this happens.

Sir Nose
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:15 am

Post by Sir Nose » Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:19 am

Woot woot!!!!

Another idea for LP improvement. Reading through the thread now, some of my ideas were okay some were eahhh so-so at best. I think this one would be hot. It should be possible through softwear and could open up the LP to an area of sound that it has not been super well suited, pads.

Patch morph. Set the destination patch and the amount of time/ beats for the transition to occur and all the parameters would slowly change from one patch to another. I'm not sure if the processor could handle all parameters at once so maybe it would require some settings to be the same on both the source and the destination patch.

edit: If the computer based patch editor could generate a midi sequence of CCs to drop into a sequencer to create the morph, that would be almost as nice. And I might even buy it then.

User avatar
mayidunk
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:28 am

Post by mayidunk » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:40 am

Sir Nose wrote:Woot woot!!!!

Another idea for LP improvement. Reading through the thread now, some of my ideas were okay some were eahhh so-so at best. I think this one would be hot. It should be possible through softwear and could open up the LP to an area of sound that it has not been super well suited, pads.

Patch morph. Set the destination patch and the amount of time/ beats for the transition to occur and all the parameters would slowly change from one patch to another. I'm not sure if the processor could handle all parameters at once so maybe it would require some settings to be the same on both the source and the destination patch.

edit: If the computer based patch editor could generate a midi sequence of CCs to drop into a sequencer to create the morph, that would be almost as nice. And I might even buy it then.
And with that, have the capability to morph back and forth between patches using the mod wheel!

CTRLSHFT
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: boulder, co
Contact:

Post by CTRLSHFT » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:52 pm

Sir Nose wrote:Woot woot!!!!

Another idea for LP improvement. Reading through the thread now, some of my ideas were okay some were eahhh so-so at best. I think this one would be hot. It should be possible through softwear and could open up the LP to an area of sound that it has not been super well suited, pads.

Patch morph. Set the destination patch and the amount of time/ beats for the transition to occur and all the parameters would slowly change from one patch to another. I'm not sure if the processor could handle all parameters at once so maybe it would require some settings to be the same on both the source and the destination patch.

edit: If the computer based patch editor could generate a midi sequence of CCs to drop into a sequencer to create the morph, that would be almost as nice. And I might even buy it then.
Really cool idea!
www.ctrlshft.com

User avatar
superd2112
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by superd2112 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:10 am

lovedroid wrote:Aftertouch!
+ a 2nd modulation slot to be able to use the aftertouch to anything... :)


This pretty much sums it up for me as well. A second LFO is my main wish, and aftertouch is a close second. Add a 3rd oscillator, and you would have a machine which would come very close to the Voyager's sonics, while still being lighter, more portable and more affordable.

jamezdd73
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by jamezdd73 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:23 am

This was sort of mentioned in the Taurus forum...

But being able to split the keyboard, so that one section plays the LP normally, and the other sends midi out. And you can choose where the split point is.
Little Phatty Stage II #3602, MoogerFooger CP-251 #1785
MF-103 12 Stage Phaser #6093, MF-104m Analog Delay #0301
--
My band: www.facebook.com/InstantMorning

User avatar
Voltor07
Posts: 5197
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 3:04 am
Location: Waukegan, IL USA
Contact:

Post by Voltor07 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:06 pm

Sir Nose wrote:Woot woot!!!!

Another idea for LP improvement. Reading through the thread now, some of my ideas were okay some were eahhh so-so at best. I think this one would be hot. It should be possible through softwear and could open up the LP to an area of sound that it has not been super well suited, pads.

Patch morph. Set the destination patch and the amount of time/ beats for the transition to occur and all the parameters would slowly change from one patch to another. I'm not sure if the processor could handle all parameters at once so maybe it would require some settings to be the same on both the source and the destination patch.

edit: If the computer based patch editor could generate a midi sequence of CCs to drop into a sequencer to create the morph, that would be almost as nice. And I might even buy it then.
This would be amazing! :shock: Also, being able to split the keyboard so part of it sends MIDI would be most useful...for those who use MIDI extensively. :D
Minitaur, CP-251, EHX #1 Echo, EHX Space Drums/Crash Pads, QSC GX-3, Pyramid stereo power amp, Miracle Pianos, Walking Stick ribbon controller, Synthutron.com, 1983 Hammond organ, dot com modular.

tyrannosaurus mark
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:37 am

Post by tyrannosaurus mark » Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:24 am

jamezdd73 wrote:This was sort of mentioned in the Taurus forum...

But being able to split the keyboard, so that one section plays the LP normally, and the other sends midi out. And you can choose where the split point is.
Would love this!

CTRLSHFT
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: boulder, co
Contact:

Post by CTRLSHFT » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:44 pm

Here's a wacky thought:

Being able to split the KB to play different patches between the two splits.

Like psuedo-bi-timbral action!

I think they'd probably need a faster chip in the LP somewhere to be able to handle switching between the two at any decent tempo, but could be fun.

Otherwise, they could make a Polyanalog and give us bitimbrality that way. :wink:
www.ctrlshft.com

tyrannosaurus mark
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:37 am

Post by tyrannosaurus mark » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:12 am

Try playing and switching through presets really quick, it creates weird (and sometimes cool) artifacts, I imagine that's what would happen if they tried to implement that

CTRLSHFT
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: boulder, co
Contact:

Post by CTRLSHFT » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:08 pm

tyrannosaurus mark wrote:Try playing and switching through presets really quick, it creates weird (and sometimes cool) artifacts, I imagine that's what would happen if they tried to implement that
I gave my LP a minor heart attack doing that the other day, froze up for 30 seconds or so before it'd refresh to the new patch from cruising through others.

I could do this more slowly and time compress accordingly through, could be fun... :twisted:
www.ctrlshft.com

User avatar
_DemonDan_
Posts: 1273
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:52 pm

Post by _DemonDan_ » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:48 am

CTRLSHFT wrote:I gave my LP a minor heart attack doing that the other day, froze up for 30 seconds
or so before it'd refresh to the new patch from cruising through others.

I could do this more slowly and time compress accordingly through, could be fun.
Hi CTRLSHFT,

It's possible that the freezing you experienced was do to an issue with the LP's current OS.

If you scroll too quickly past a patch that uses LFO as the Arp Clock you'll freeze (as described).

The fix is to change those patches to use something other than LFO for the Arp's Clock.

I think this is most or all of the patches that do so:

4, 6, 11, 14, 18, 33, 40, 44, 46, 66, 82.

I don't have my LP with me right now but I think this list is correct.
_ :twisted: _DemonDan_ :twisted: _

Post Reply