I want to add to @AlakaLazlo that using the Moog as
controller in your studio will work just fine. He was mentioning the use as a
central part of a MIDI studio, and yes, this is unfortunately not a good idea. The Moog One is still not really stable when it comes to MIDI input, especially on more complex, multi-timbral presets. But not output! The keyboard is very good, MW and PW are superb. The only issue is that using a continuous controller for sustain will not really work as expected, since it doesn't allow to output 127. Might be a bug in my machine, but just to mention it.
So, what's the problem with MIDI
input in detail? Well, most important is that you will almost definitely experience hanging notes. Furthermore, the Local On/Off policy is very confusing, to say it friendly. To say it less friendly, it won't work at all. GrooveSynthesis has shown that it can be implemented in a cool way, but that's not what we find in the Moog One.
The timing is also not as accurate as you might wish. Say you output a 5 note chord sequence that runs perfectly from the internal sequencer, record it in the DAW and play it back to the MoogOne... it will be anything but tight.
Yep. That's the bad news. The good news is that the MoogOne is the most versatile, dense and creative synth ever built. My opinion. The OS is fantastic too, but not mature. And it will unfortunately never be mature, so you must decide if you can live with the status quo.
EDIT/ADDENDUM: I have quite a lot of synths (41 at the moment). The MoogOne gives me the
greatest joy of them all when I just want to sit, program and play. For productions, it's only used when I do not find something elsewhere OR when building complex sounds or soundscapes. Definitely not for standard pads or brass
