Moog why? (CV tracking)
Moog why? (CV tracking)
Does anyone know or understand why Voyagers (some, most, all?) do not track CV input at 1V per octave? They seem to track at slightly less, creating obvious problems. The factory mod is mostly useless for overseas peeps like myself.
Happy new year!
Sid
dadareykjavik.bandcamp.com
https://soundcloud.com/sigtryggurj-hannsson
Happy new year!
Sid
dadareykjavik.bandcamp.com
https://soundcloud.com/sigtryggurj-hannsson
Voyager OS, Prophet 08, Rhodes MkI 73, NordLead2 and more...
- stiiiiiiive
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
0,97V/Oct, if I remember correct.
The mod is feasible by any Moog tech I guess. Maybe even by yourself provided you get the right procedure and you have a little electronics background.
Hopefully someone will chime in and detail the procedure
The mod is feasible by any Moog tech I guess. Maybe even by yourself provided you get the right procedure and you have a little electronics background.
Hopefully someone will chime in and detail the procedure

Toxic Overdrive | Minkovski | DNOT | Maetherial | Folie à 6
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
The only answer to "why" that I have is a guess ...
My guess is that (I've said this before in other threads) Moog meant to have the CV input used for continuous voltage controllers such as Theremin, Pitch bend, Exp pedals, and yes, an analog sequencer (non-quantized) will work perfectly also.
I also think that the .97 is rumor or happenstance, or dumb luck... it's just the product of all of the tolerances within the components in that part of the circuit.. but again, I'm guessing. I've used a MP-201 quantized to a custom voltage and it's worked perfectly for me. The MP is an amazing device.
Fact is that R47 on the analog board is 100K and if you replace it with a 90K resistor and put a 25K trim pot in there, you can tune it to perfection.
Have a look at the first two photos on my Flickr... and read the captions. Don't pay too much attention to the colors of the resistors or caps, etc; this is from two diff Voyagers (both owned by me at diff times):
https://flic.kr/ps/2QTK3D
My guess is that (I've said this before in other threads) Moog meant to have the CV input used for continuous voltage controllers such as Theremin, Pitch bend, Exp pedals, and yes, an analog sequencer (non-quantized) will work perfectly also.
I also think that the .97 is rumor or happenstance, or dumb luck... it's just the product of all of the tolerances within the components in that part of the circuit.. but again, I'm guessing. I've used a MP-201 quantized to a custom voltage and it's worked perfectly for me. The MP is an amazing device.
Fact is that R47 on the analog board is 100K and if you replace it with a 90K resistor and put a 25K trim pot in there, you can tune it to perfection.
Have a look at the first two photos on my Flickr... and read the captions. Don't pay too much attention to the colors of the resistors or caps, etc; this is from two diff Voyagers (both owned by me at diff times):
https://flic.kr/ps/2QTK3D
'76 Minimoog, Taurus 3, Oberheim FVS + Son of 2-voice; Sequential ProOne; Juno 106; Moog Model 15; Kurzweil 250; Hammond M3; and a handful of Fender Basses Flickr!
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
The weird v/oct is a product of the DAC IC they selected which made the internal design easier.
Gear list: '04 Saturn Ion, John Deere X300 tractor, ganged set of seven reel mowers for 3 acres of lawn, herd of sheep for backup lawn mowers, two tiger cats for mouse population control Oh you meant MUSIC gear Oops I hit the 255 character limi
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
But easily compensated by addition of a $0.52 trim pot? Would seem to be an oversight or maybe just a design consideration/opportunity missed.
I guess in 'those days', there wasn't much mind paid to 'other' CV gear. This was early 2000s and Analog was [still] dead post Andromeda.
Sort of makes one wonder what type of scheme was used in scanning the keyboard circuit and subsequently turning a depressed key into a precise voltage that WAS dead on.
Reminds me of the SSL 1200 OSC (in MU Modular); I had two of them, purchased at the same time and found that the 2nd CV input was NOT regulated so when I bent pitch with an analog controller, each of the OSCs bent differently; it was driving me up the wall. I asked the module designer WTF and was told "I could have done it so that it bent perfectly but that would have requited additional circuitry". wha?
In Moog's defense, I really don't think they were counting on a resurgence of analog controllers regardless of the fact that they lead it. Things have changed and we are all swimming in it.
I guess in 'those days', there wasn't much mind paid to 'other' CV gear. This was early 2000s and Analog was [still] dead post Andromeda.
Sort of makes one wonder what type of scheme was used in scanning the keyboard circuit and subsequently turning a depressed key into a precise voltage that WAS dead on.
Reminds me of the SSL 1200 OSC (in MU Modular); I had two of them, purchased at the same time and found that the 2nd CV input was NOT regulated so when I bent pitch with an analog controller, each of the OSCs bent differently; it was driving me up the wall. I asked the module designer WTF and was told "I could have done it so that it bent perfectly but that would have requited additional circuitry". wha?
In Moog's defense, I really don't think they were counting on a resurgence of analog controllers regardless of the fact that they lead it. Things have changed and we are all swimming in it.
'76 Minimoog, Taurus 3, Oberheim FVS + Son of 2-voice; Sequential ProOne; Juno 106; Moog Model 15; Kurzweil 250; Hammond M3; and a handful of Fender Basses Flickr!
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
My voyager is perfect. Outputs exactly 1V/Oct and is in great tune with other gear. I'd be cautious of suggesting many or most are not perfect without actual head counting.
B
B
I've stopped talking now.
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
"OUT" or in?LivePsy wrote:My voyager is perfect. Outputs exactly 1V/Oct and is in great tune with other gear. I'd be cautious of suggesting many or most are not perfect without actual head counting.
B
I could be wrong (ask my wife) but I think the subject of this thread is CV Pitch Input. My Voyager Old School (which incidentally has Pitch CV out withOUT the requirement of a VX-351) tracked perfectly OUT also but in was a nightmare.
My Select doesn't have a Pitch CV out onboard so yes, it's the CV-351 in action and luckily, they have a pot built in which can be tuned to be precisely 1V/oct. That's handy.
But for CV in? It's certainly possible that some are perfect but I think that many are not. Hence the mod which is discussed above.
Feel free to strike me down if I've got this incorrect, It's lack of attention to detail and my ADD more than anything internal or dismissive. Again, ask my wife... she rarely believes anything I say...


'76 Minimoog, Taurus 3, Oberheim FVS + Son of 2-voice; Sequential ProOne; Juno 106; Moog Model 15; Kurzweil 250; Hammond M3; and a handful of Fender Basses Flickr!
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
You're absolutely right. I'm handing in my Moog membership for not noticing that. Output from the VX-351 is exactly 1v each octave and the Voyager is perfectly in tune. But turn off local and feed the keyboard out to the pitch in is flat and only lasts a couple of octaves before it is out of tune.EMwhite wrote:"OUT" or in?LivePsy wrote:My voyager is perfect. Outputs exactly 1V/Oct and is in great tune with other gear. I'd be cautious of suggesting many or most are not perfect without actual head counting.
B
The CP-251 four input mixer seems to correct for this, but then it fixes everything

B
I've stopped talking now.
Re: Moog why? (CV tracking)
Thanks for that. I'll dive in with some assistance and get this under control.
Regards, sid
Regards, sid
Voyager OS, Prophet 08, Rhodes MkI 73, NordLead2 and more...