MF104 and MF101 potards quality

alx002 · Post by **alx002** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:09 pm

Did anyone notice the difference of touch in the potards of the 104 and 101???

The 104 has some really good potards compared to the 101? no?

MC · Post by MC » Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:53 pm

WTH is a potard?

Dannymon · Post by **Dannymon** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:33 pm

MC wrote:WTH is a potard?

Hehehe.....I think he means the knobs.

alx002 · Post by **alx002** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:18 am

Yes of course I wanted to say KNOB

Or potentiometer!!

So any feedback about that??

falseface11 · Post by **falseface11** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:42 pm

yes, my first piece of "new" moog equipment was the mf-104, after that i bought every other piece of equipment that they offer sans pianobar & theremin,and an additional cp-251. i cannot say that i was not dissapointed in the quality of the pots for all except murf and voyager, and the quality of the wood and finish in all but the voyager. for me it was a rough comparison, so i bought another mf-104!!

OysterRock · Post by **OysterRock** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:37 pm

I think you are questioning the "feel" of the pots rather than the "quality". These things are not necessarily related. Yes, they don't have the same heavy feel as the Voyager, but I personally have absolutely no fear of them failing. I've never heard of the MF's pots going bad.