Hi,
I’m using the slim phatty with my akai 4000s breath controller. The SP doesn’t accept Breath controller cc2. Can we have an update so that it will please?
Anyway I mapped cc2 using the midi solutions event processor plus but for some reason I can only map this cc one cc on the SP. If i try and send it to more than 1 it will only accept the first controller mapping that I’ve programmed on the EPP (or it could be the last 1, I can’t remember offhand). For example if I map cc2 to cc19, 21 and 64 it will only respond with cc19.
Does anyone know why this could be happening. I’m happy to provide more info I initially thought the EPP was faulty but thats not the case.
Many thanks
Pete
Are you sure this isn’t an EPP issue? Kind of sounds like it is…
Hi davy,
I tried sending the same mappings to my evolver which is not so user friendly. I mapped the volume to the sustain pedal (I created a mute function basically) which worked everytime regardless of where I put it in a sequence of 3 mappings and it muted everytime. Which means it was being recognized, 1st, 2nd or 3rd in a serious of 3 epp mappings. I tried this as I know midi breath data is substantial so I wanted to focus on the basic function simplistically. The other cc’s I sent were difficult to assess the results where a bit chaotic but the mute function was obvious. I need to do more diagnostics on the epp but that test suggests that it will map 1 cc to several which it doesn’t on the Slim!
would be great if i had another EPP!
Has anyone else mapped 1 cc to more than 1cc with an EPP? I noticed when I sent expression cc11 (i think thats osc1 wavetable) from the EWI to the slim it would respond with the wave sweep but it would ignore all events from the EPP. It responds fine to breath, volume on cc7 from the ewi throughout all my experiments. So I can have volume breath control but only 1 other cc with breath control using the epp!
Does anyone know if the pot mapping feature is worth exploring. Could I control more than 1 cc from my breath volume, i wouldn’t have thought so?!
thanks
pete