Page 1 of 2
How about a LP rack version
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:27 pm
by frestrobbe
I wonder how many people would like a rack version (with some CV I/O's on the front) of the Little Phatty to be available?
I sure wouldn't mind, I still have some empty rack space

Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 3:23 am
by Prime NL
I call it a Voyager RME....so no thanks...
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:40 am
by narrowcaster
With comprehensive CV I/O then absolutely (it would presumably be quite a bit cheaper than the Voyager RME, and still all I need). Without the CV I/O, or with very limited CV options, much less interested.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 4:43 pm
by JWaltman
I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all

Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 9:28 pm
by jamezdd73
JWaltman wrote:I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all

+1 with four voices per module!
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:28 am
by EricK
I voted yes on a LPRME, but not without knobs.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 9:16 am
by magnet
I think a 'rack' Lp (or in a nice wood case) would be a welcome addition,
but understand it probably isn't simply a matter of parts >> case. There would
have to be a certain amount of engineering to pull it off well, and I doubt there's
much development time for it.
I would like to see cv jacks, etc.on the front though.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:12 pm
by JWaltman
jamezdd73 wrote:JWaltman wrote:I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all

+1 with four voices per module!
Or, maybe a modular approach.. Rack + 1 voice cardridge for 700, room for 3 more cardridges for 250 a piece... Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:23 am
by jamezdd73
JWaltman wrote:Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.
That'd be awesome, I'd love to be able to poly-fy my LP without the need for extra cables and stuff.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 4:20 am
by eXode
I'd love to see a rack and/or desktop version of the LP. Extra CV would be great but wouldn't mind if it only came with standard as well.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:13 am
by frestrobbe
JWaltman wrote:jamezdd73 wrote:
Or, maybe a modular approach.. Rack + 1 voice cardridge for 700, room for 3 more cardridges for 250 a piece... Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.
A rack LP with option to expand polyphony internally would be brilliant, if it's technically possible.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:40 am
by monokit
i am sure Rudi Linhard wouldn´t mind helping with the design and programming...

Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:47 pm
by CTRLSHFT
While the Voyager RME is fantastic and already exists, I agree completely that a LP RME would definitely fill a cool niche in the product line, especially if they could find a way to swing it for ~$1k. I'm certain they could probably simplify the interface and electronics down into a 3 space rackmount. Adding a polychain feature would be fun too.
Honestly though, right now I think there are bigger ideas afoot. This may need to be put on the back burner until we get the next big announcement...

Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:35 am
by t.o.t.s.
I'd be happy with a rackmount voice expansion module with no knobs, no menu, no screen... just cheap additional voices to control from the LP.
Re: How about a LP rack version
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:19 am
by jimknopf
Yes, definitely useful, especially to get to some polyphony without having LP keyboards all over the place.
MUCH more interesting would be something like a LP 4/5-voice rack to get a five or 6 voice LP, especially if the price for a four-voice would stay around 3500€.
Don't know if that is possible, but from my view affordable polyphony is the next key step for Moog, this way or another.