Page 1 of 1
MF-107 FreqBox waveform indicators
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:38 pm
by waxdoctor
dear all,
does anybody know which MF-107 model comes with the waveform indicator scale showing the symbols?
the newer boxes or the older?
because I'd like to buy one of this nice boxes with waveform symbols on.
(I don't like the "digit version" freqbox so much - I guess it sounds a little diffrent
))
ridiculous question I know - but...
thanks
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:47 pm
by GregAE
You know, I never looked that closely before, but there are two different panel legends on the '107.
My FB (S/N 0806, manufactured & purchased recently) has the waveforms on the panel, so I'd guess all current units have the waveform graphic. Perhaps other FB owners can post their serial numbers to confirm?
FWIW, the picture on the Moog site shows the 'digit' (older?) version:
http://www.moogmusic.com/moogerfooger/? ... t_id=21053
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:27 pm
by waxdoctor
Thanx - GregAE - you are great!
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:46 pm
by latigid on
I remember Moog users, after viewing the prototype at NAMM, requested the original waveform knob be changed from the numeric design to a replica of the Voyager's.
Perhaps there are only a few of the former in existence?
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:02 pm
by earsmack
Mine has waveform symbols. Serial number 0028.
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:38 am
by CTRLSHFT
latigid on wrote:I remember Moog users, after viewing the prototype at NAMM, requested the original waveform knob be changed from the numeric design to a replica of the Voyager's.
Perhaps there are only a few of the former in existence?
's a shame, the waveform route is alot more fun, visually.
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:48 am
by electrical_engineer_gEEk
CTRLSHFT wrote:
's a shame, the waveform route is alot more fun, visually.
Huh???
you might want to re-read then
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:30 pm
by CTRLSHFT
electrical_engineer_gEEk wrote:CTRLSHFT wrote:
's a shame, the waveform route is alot more fun, visually.
Huh???
you might want to re-read then
was replying to latigid's comment, nm..