Subharmonicon sequencer trigger bug?
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2024 4:19 pm
Hi all! While performing with the Subharmonicon (and M32 + 2 DFAMs) I activate and deactivate SEQ2 for song variations.
I've noticed that sometimes, SEQ2 will NOT advance when SEQ1 loops from step 4 to 1!
After some more testing I've found the following:
My Setup:
Firmware 1.1.1
Rhythm 1 - controls SEQ1.
Rhythm 2 - controls SEQ2.
If I let only SEQ1 run, and I press the reset button, and before SEQ1 reaches its last step I activate SEQ2, then SEQ2 will NOT advance when SEQ1 loops from step 4 to step 1.
It seems that SEQ2 only will advance if SEQ1 has made a FULL cycle.
For me this behaviour is a bit tricky when performing 'live', as I want to fully control when Seq2 will 'kick in', but because of this, sometimes I will get an extra full loop in SEQ1 before SEQ2 starts, and that messes up the timing in my performance.
I would like that SEQ2 ALWAYS will advance when SEQ1 goes from step 4 to step 1, because then I will know exactly when SEQ2 will 'kick in' after pressing the SEQ2 button.
Am I missing something? Is this "by design"? ... or did I find a bug?
Best regards, Andreas
I've noticed that sometimes, SEQ2 will NOT advance when SEQ1 loops from step 4 to 1!
After some more testing I've found the following:
My Setup:
Firmware 1.1.1
Rhythm 1 - controls SEQ1.
Rhythm 2 - controls SEQ2.
If I let only SEQ1 run, and I press the reset button, and before SEQ1 reaches its last step I activate SEQ2, then SEQ2 will NOT advance when SEQ1 loops from step 4 to step 1.
It seems that SEQ2 only will advance if SEQ1 has made a FULL cycle.
For me this behaviour is a bit tricky when performing 'live', as I want to fully control when Seq2 will 'kick in', but because of this, sometimes I will get an extra full loop in SEQ1 before SEQ2 starts, and that messes up the timing in my performance.
I would like that SEQ2 ALWAYS will advance when SEQ1 goes from step 4 to step 1, because then I will know exactly when SEQ2 will 'kick in' after pressing the SEQ2 button.
Am I missing something? Is this "by design"? ... or did I find a bug?
Best regards, Andreas