Page 1 of 1

mf-104Z question

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:50 am
by max3
I was wondering if it is possible to get the delayed signal to fade in each time. I am trying to play a passage that would be nice if the delayed signal could swell up to volume instead of a full signal then decay. I guess maybe a reverse delay?

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:30 am
by MarkM
I suppose you could take the delay loop out of the 104 and process it with another effect box with reverse.

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:17 pm
by Bryan T
You could try something like the Guyatone Slow Volume or Boss Slow Gear in the effects loop, though you have to play cleanly to keep the effect active.

Another option would be to use the envelope out of the low pass filter to control the mix on the delay pedal. You'd need to invert the signal with the CP251, which seems like an awfully complicated setup to get that effect.

Bryan

Reverse Echo

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:50 pm
by eric coleridge
Use a Volume Pedal on the Echo signal to gradually bring it up to the volume of the clean signal.

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:45 pm
by asd
do you want each repeat to be 'played back' in reverse so that the volume swells? if you do, i would probably follow mark's line of thinking and either put in the effects loop or put the wet signal out through a reverse delay. reverse delays are tricky though because you end up with that jarring moment when the delay stops to put the signal backwards.

or do you want each repeat to successively get louder? you could use an lfo on the mix for this (possibly combined with one on the feedback control so that it could really swell out of control, a sawtooth wave would probably work well). you'd probably get more control with one of the expression pedals and just turn the mix up and down (the feedback too) as you want the effect to swell or dissipate.

exp pedal in mix parameter?

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:00 pm
by cpt nevo
would you be able to achieve that with an exp pedal on the mix parameter, bringing the wet signal in/out gradually?