Page 1 of 1

New Moog Poly???

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:32 pm
by basssfx
With all this talk of new products, I was thinking about the Moog polyphonic synth idea. I realise you could effectively buy 16 Voyager RMEs and assign each to a MIDI channel. With a MIDI master keyboard, you would have a very nice poly!

From the moog site, 16 x $2395 = $38320!!! Which is alot of money by anyone's standards.

Now, you would have 16 ch of polyphony, but the synth would be polytimbral. Do we need 16 ch of polytimbral-ness? I don't think so.

So, use a standard Voyager with one set of knobs, and use mults. to send all the CV signals to each component of each channel. The result would be a monotimbral polyphonic synth with a useable (who says the Voyager isn't useable!) interface.

Now by no means am I an expert, so please feel free to tell me how it is.


RIP Bob

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:39 pm
by OysterRock
I would like to see a poly expander for the Voyager. Something like the the RME except no knobs, no display, no nuthin... just a rackmount box. Only MIDI and audio in/out. A couple hundred a pop, I'd buy a few...

That's just what I'd want though, everyone feel free to pick apart my suggestion and tell me how their idea is better :)

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:44 pm
by basssfx
How would you control each setting? Would it be possible to have 16 voices playing and twiddle knobs at the same time? I.e would you have enough MIDI channels? (You would have to be some kind of poly-octapus to do this though).

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:47 pm
by OysterRock
You would have to have a Voyager (or RME) as the master controller. You'd set it up just like you set up the RMEs as poly expanders. The master Voyager would control all the expanders, it would act like a normal polysynth.

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:56 pm
by basssfx
Yup, that was exactly what I was thinking. Moog could possibly also make a 16ch poly-expander, as it would be cheaper than buying 16 (15 if you already had a Voyager) RMEs or single channel poly-expanders

Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 5:37 pm
by Array
OysterRock wrote:I would like to see a poly expander for the Voyager. Something like the the RME except no knobs, no display, no nuthin... just a rackmount box. Only MIDI and audio in/out. A couple hundred a pop, I'd buy a few...

That's just what I'd want though, everyone feel free to pick apart my suggestion and tell me how their idea is better :)
A couple hundred a pop? How do you suggest this will be accomplished?

If Moog Music does release a new polyphonic synthesizer, I would want it to be a product which is seperate from the Voyager. In fact, it most likely would be. It would probably be digitally controlled in order to save money, space, and excess heat. I dont think that many people would be thrilled with the idea of slopping digitally controller oscillators and filters onto their Voyager....the additional voices just wouldnt sound/behave in the same manner.

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 1:05 pm
by theglyph
A poly would be nice but i'm sure it would be expensive ( >$3000 ).

I would like to see Moog release a modern version of the Micromoog.

Benefits? You can get the Moog sound for less than $1000. It would be much more portable than a Voyager. Moog can make $ without having to rely on selling wall clocks and belt buckles. We wouldn't have to go through ebay to get an inexpenisve Moog.

Maybe they can call it the Micromoog Discovery!

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 1:54 pm
by Arpmoogscience
I would be happy a 8 voice poly

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 1:59 pm
by sir_dss
Moog makes a cheaper synth and a synth that can become polyphonic called...

The Voyager RME!

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 2:51 pm
by Array
sir_dss wrote:Moog makes a cheaper synth and a synth that can become polyphonic called...

The Voyager RME!
Except for the fact that this isnt an affordable solution, nor is it portable. Some people here go on gigs you know (not me though).

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:29 pm
by sir_dss
Then use a softsynth(Arturia MiniMoog) with the Voyager as a controler and through the EXT IN. That will make it cheap and polyphonic.

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 5:48 pm
by MC
sir_dss wrote:Then use a softsynth(Arturia MiniMoog) with the Voyager as a controler and through the EXT IN. That will make it cheap and polyphonic.
I played with the Arturia Minimoog at winter NAMM2005. It doesn't sound like a Minimoog to my ears, and I use both model D and Voyager at home. The weak point is the filter.

Arturia might be cheap, but it doesn't sound like a moog.

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 7:03 pm
by sir_dss
Ok...

What are you playing now?

How about a Prophet 5?

Moog isn't going to make a Polyphonic synth that what the RME addressed.

And the Voyager is already a $3000+ synth.

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:06 pm
by OysterRock
Array wrote:
OysterRock wrote:I would like to see a poly expander for the Voyager. Something like the the RME except no knobs, no display, no nuthin... just a rackmount box. Only MIDI and audio in/out. A couple hundred a pop, I'd buy a few...

That's just what I'd want though, everyone feel free to pick apart my suggestion and tell me how their idea is better :)
A couple hundred a pop? How do you suggest this will be accomplished?

If Moog Music does release a new polyphonic synthesizer, I would want it to be a product which is seperate from the Voyager. In fact, it most likely would be. It would probably be digitally controlled in order to save money, space, and excess heat. I dont think that many people would be thrilled with the idea of slopping digitally controller oscillators and filters onto their Voyager....the additional voices just wouldnt sound/behave in the same manner.
Who said anything about digitally controlled? A simple one voice expander that is a stripped down RME. $500-800. Very do-able.

I'm just thinking out loud of what I'd like. I don't really care what you think or what you would like, though :wink: