Page 1 of 1
MF104 and MF101 potards quality
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:09 pm
by alx002
Did anyone notice the difference of touch in the potards of the 104 and 101???
The 104 has some really good potards compared to the 101? no?
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:53 pm
by MC
WTH is a potard?
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:33 pm
by Dannymon
MC wrote:WTH is a potard?
Hehehe.....I think he means the knobs.
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:18 am
by alx002
Yes of course I wanted to say KNOB
Or potentiometer!!
So any feedback about that??
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:42 pm
by falseface11
yes, my first piece of "new" moog equipment was the mf-104, after that i bought every other piece of equipment that they offer sans pianobar & theremin,and an additional cp-251. i cannot say that i was not dissapointed in the quality of the pots for all except murf and voyager, and the quality of the wood and finish in all but the voyager. for me it was a rough comparison, so i bought another mf-104!!
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:37 pm
by OysterRock
I think you are questioning the "feel" of the pots rather than the "quality". These things are not necessarily related. Yes, they don't have the same heavy feel as the Voyager, but I personally have absolutely no fear of them failing. I've never heard of the MF's pots going bad.