Moog Music Forum

thealien666 wrote:Yeah, nice bokeh there, fyvewytches.

EricK wrote:Nice depth of field on that shot.

Leica 75mm Summilux wide open (that's 1.4)

Portamental wrote:

thealien666 wrote:Yeah, nice bokeh there, fyvewytches.

It's a sign of the times (and marketplace) when the MacBeth gets a (big big big) wow!!!!! and the Sub-Phatty gets unnoticed , almost.

I don't think the Sub-Phatty is unnoticed by any means. I've not heard it 'live' yet but most of the stuff I have heard and read about it has left me wanting one.

But I believe the MacBeth is a *totally* different instrument. One of the features that made me pre-order it over a year ago was that the three oscillators can be used independently, each has it's own CV in and output.... and of course the sound is out of this world !

So I don't think the times or marketplace come into it here. Two different instruments and posted on a Moog forum the MacBeth is obviously less known that the Sub-Phatty and may grab a bit of attention.

Together we will refloat the world economy, wholely on the back of analogue music equipment sales

moving from a novation remote sl to this..... absolute luxury!

Cej wrote:

moving from a novation remote sl to this..... absolute luxury!

How much was this? Kit or pre-built?

fyvewytches wrote: ...stuff...

wow!!!!!!

mico wrote:

Cej wrote:

moving from a novation remote sl to this..... absolute luxury!

How much was this? Kit or pre-built?

unfortunately Doepfer don't make these anymore

....over the past 5 days I have come to the realisation that they are reeking with a quality build

IMHO, if you ever see one for sale, and have the currency >> don't hesitate >> buy it!!!

My Sub-Phatty just got here today. My first Moog! And my first piece of hardware.

I can honestly say that Marc's videos really sealed the deal for me.

I couldn't be more happy!

Thank you Marc Doty for your great series of videos.

T

lfo2vco wrote:Together we will refloat the world economy, wholely on the back of analogue music equipment sales

Ha not me I buy everything used...

Latest purchase...Tascam 688...8 track cassette portastudio. Why, when I have all kinds of great recording gear? Because it sounds bad, and sometimes sounding bad is good. That's why I also use a 388 all the time...the 688 is just more portable and cheaper to use...

twelsch42 wrote:My Sub-Phatty just got here today. My first Moog! And my first piece of hardware.

Nice way to start, congrats !!

I got started back in 1998 on a tascam porta 02. I think it was great, despite the hiss. Having nly 4 tracks to work with was still quite expressive. It is a lot easier than logic, and I think it's a bit more personal also. Maybe it's just a tactile thing.

My friend had the vintage rack mount 8 track but he messed up the tape speed motor in it getting all kinds of wacky psychedelic sounds.

Tascam was always better than fostex in my opinion.

I just found these walking the local hardware store. They seem to be exactly what i need even if I don't have a BBQ.

Portamental wrote:I just found these walking the local hardware store. They seem to be exactly what i need even if I don't have a BBQ.

wow !!!!!!

EricK wrote:I got started back in 1998 on a tascam porta 02. I think it was great, despite the hiss. Having nly 4 tracks to work with was still quite expressive. It is a lot easier than logic, and I think it's a bit more personal also. Maybe it's just a tactile thing.

My friend had the vintage rack mount 8 track but he messed up the tape speed motor in it getting all kinds of wacky psychedelic sounds.

Tascam was always better than fostex in my opinion.

Tascam has always been Trashcan to me...but the 388s I have run pretty well and the 688 I thought would be amusing to record synths/drums to...then sample back...