Moog Music Forum

Heres the Founder of Roland demonstrating it its actually pretty amusing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmAr8dZgAAs

Heres another one thats pretty interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJlLiU9eFC4&NR=1


This is nice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUSYeBiZ ... re=related

That last video did not impress me in the least haha.

eXode wrote:

Mr Arkadin wrote:Here's the problem: unlike analogue, VA can always be improved - until perhaps you reach a point where they are indistinguishable. So 15-year-old VA technology is not good because many things can still be improved. Are you really telling my a JP-8000 sounds analogue? Sorry but Roland's COSM is not good. You want modelling? Then people like Sonic|Core and GForce do it better. Just hire those people will you Roland?

You read in a lot more into my post than what is actually there. I haven't said anything about VA technology at all. My post wasn't even directed at you (see the quote), I was reffering to the comment about rehasing and how I found it funny (and still do).

Please explain how one can interpret that as a debate over VA?

Because there are reasons that a 15 y.o. VA will sound like crap compared to a new one, while a 40 y.o. modular is the same technology as most parts of modulars made today. This seemed like what he was saying to me, at least

moremagic wrote:Because there are reasons that a 15 y.o. VA will sound like crap compared to a new one, while a 40 y.o. modular is the same technology as most parts of modulars made today. This seemed like what he was saying to me, at least

Yes but like I explained that wasn't anything I commented on.

I COMMENTED ON THE ACTUAL CONCEPT OF REHASHING, WITHOUT ANY VALUES REGARDING THE KIND OF TECHNOLOGY BEING REHASHED.

Is that so hard to understand? I wasn't weighing in any values over different technologies and that's why I responded in the first place. The reponse I got from Mr Arkadin to my original post was that he thought that I seemed to suggest that a JP8000 sounds as good or better than discrete components, I have never suggested such a thing. See my answer a couple of lines above in bold capitals if it's still not clear to you.

I thought that given the nature of the OP, people could understand sarcasm when they see it. Apparently I was dead wrong.