new moog poly synth
MOOG forever!
Endeavor, endeavor, anddever, and ever, & ever...
Endeavor, endeavor, anddever, and ever, & ever...
Little Phatty TE #1023 • Schrittmacher • Walking Stick ribbon • Korg microXL/Electribe MX/KaossPro • Sonnus G2M
MF-101 Filter • MF-102 Ring • MF-103 Phaser • MF-104Z Delay • MF-105 MuRF • MF-107 FreqBox • MF-108M Cluster • Etherwave
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
MF-101 Filter • MF-102 Ring • MF-103 Phaser • MF-104Z Delay • MF-105 MuRF • MF-107 FreqBox • MF-108M Cluster • Etherwave
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:55 am
new moog poly synth
Thanks for taking the time to reply in such detail.
I now don't regret not ever having a polymoog, no wonder Numan stopped using them, i'll just wait to see what moog come up with and in the mean time carry on lusting after virus, lol thanks for your time
Matt J
I now don't regret not ever having a polymoog, no wonder Numan stopped using them, i'll just wait to see what moog come up with and in the mean time carry on lusting after virus, lol thanks for your time
Matt J
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:55 am
Thanks for taking the time to reply in such detail, much appreciated,, i dont regret not ever having one now, no wonder numan stopped using them, thanks for your timeMC wrote:Yes they are that bad. Frankly there is too much to go wrong. All 71 keys have a little PC board that forms the waveshaping, the EG transients, and (limited, this) the filtering, These boards fit in sockets that are very unreliable and often result in dead notes or missing/deformed waveforms.matt jessup wrote:was it realy that bad, I never tried one, but i love the vox humana sound, maybe that one sound fooled me into thinking it was goodMC wrote:Er, no.
The name "Polymoog" invokes horror in many former owners
Couple that with IC sockets and interconnectors with poor quality contacts that lose their connection via oxidation or worn spring contacts, flaky power supply, early generation CMOS ICs that were prone to dying prematurely, and convoluted complex circuits that were not easy to troubleshoot. Many repair shops will not touch a Polymoog.
The Polymoog needed a couple HUNDRED engineering changes during its production. For every unit that got shipped, another one returned for repair. By the time they got the bugs ironed out (serial #3900 and higher) the Prophet-5 was in full flight and the bottom was dropping out for Polymoogs.
Vox Humana is a nice sound but the Polymoog doesn't do much other than strings and pads. For starters, only a single master VCF is available, not per key. That is a severe limitation. Oh, the aformentioned "limited" filtering per key? No resonance control, no EG, 12dB LP ladder filter, no modulation of any kind - it's strictly a brightness control.
Due to its TOS architecture, it is impossible to get voice modulation. EG or oscillator waveforms cannot be used as a modulation source to PW or VCO frequency. Hard sync is not possible (only soft sync). You can't modulate individual oscillators because the TOS system uses master high frequency VCO (one for ramp waves, one for pulse) that is divided down to create the frequencies per key - it's a fancy home organ.
The Polymoog was one of the first keyboards to feature velocity control but it could only control key level, nothing else. Its implementation was flawed - hold down the sustain pedal, press a key repeatedly using light velocity, and the key level will increase with each depression. If it worked at all. The Polymoog triggering system multiplexed a bunch of controls (velocity, attack, release, pulse width, ramp mix level) into a single control voltage (to save $$$ on the keyboard by using a single buss vs multiple busses), then the 71 PC boards had to demultiplex it into separate control signals. Yeah, like that worked reliably.
When the Prophet-5 and OB-X/Four Voice appeared they were accepted as the proper polysynth. They were capable of a far greater palette of sounds thanks to voice modulation and individual VCFs, and the Polymoog lost its appeal.
Remember that this was a keyboard that retailed for $5295 in 1976 - a LOT of $$$ back then. For the people who bought them new (one of them is a regular poster here), it was an expensive mistake.
I still own my Polymoog (bought it used) and I've been very lucky with it. It is a late production unit with all the corrections ironed out. It has seen a lot of club work and held up well - I was lucky. It has sentimental value and I'm keeping it, even though it barely sees any use.
- Christopher Winkels
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:23 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:04 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
That would be one HELL of a modular from the dotcom company. You could get that new Buchla that came out a few years ago... apparently it's a SERIOUS machine.
I had a polymoog, and I liked it... until it caught fire in my parent's basement. I had to sell it back to the guy I bought it from... for $150. Then apparently, he plugged it in and it worked perfectly... grrrr....
I had a polymoog, and I liked it... until it caught fire in my parent's basement. I had to sell it back to the guy I bought it from... for $150. Then apparently, he plugged it in and it worked perfectly... grrrr....
If Moog decides to unleash a new polyphonic synth, I would have no hesitation in pre-ordering ASAP. As far as the naming goes, I agree that Phat should not be used. Marketing wise for me, I am turned away from the Little Phatty because of the name, but it does sound pretty wicked which is what really counts.
Voyager Old School
- goldphinga
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:38 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
- superd2112
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Christopher Winkels
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:23 am
- Contact: