Voyager's filter not tracking the glide/portamento?

Tips and techniques for Minimoog Analog Synthesizers
FreqOut
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:33 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Post by FreqOut » Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:33 pm

I don't think that Moog would intentionally leave a feature out of a product, but check out this thread to see another thing that's missing:
Sawtooth LFO
That's the one at the top of my list of things to change on the Voyager.

FreqOut

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Sun Jul 25, 2004 1:27 am

Has anybody here ever successfully emailed Moog Music?

I've used the tech email auto-sender on the website here, as well as sending emails "manually", and I've never gotten so much as an acknowledgement, or even an auto-respond email from tech support.

Is there a secret unknown email? Because now I've just got no faith at all that anything I email is actually seen by humans.

-Hoax

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:40 pm

Okay. I got a response.

"I will be happy to look into the possibilities and cost of doing a hardware modification to your unit."

Excellent! I'd be more than happy to pay for this upgrade. Yes, it should've been included on a $3500 synth. But if it means paying the good people at Moog what they need, I'd be interested. Every synth ships with design compromises. If I can take care of this one, then I'm perfectly happy with the voyager.

I mean, it'd still be the second thing i grabbed in a fire, running out of the place (after my wife). But -y'know- as long as I spent this much, I might as well make it perfect.

-Hoax

chihuahuaphile
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: Fort Worth,TX

Post by chihuahuaphile » Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:46 am

well i think you would have to request this mod, because i just got my performer back from moog under warantee to fix other problems. and mine does not track the glide to filter. :(

i sure wish i would have known that it was possible to fix this problem before i sent it in.

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:34 pm

Bump.

-Hoax

User avatar
FrankB
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 3:05 am
Location: Germany

Post by FrankB » Thu Sep 16, 2004 1:30 am

Hi Hoax,

please let us know all about that modification (possibility and costs).

For me it would be interesting to get a schematic diagram showing the necessary modifications, because shipping will be too much expensive from Europe.
Frank

User avatar
ikazlar
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:58 am
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece

hi all

Post by ikazlar » Thu Sep 16, 2004 5:19 am

the filter/glide omission was known for quite some time and i am bit surprised that the matter only came up now. the sos reviewer mentioned it in his voyager review and potential buyers should ask moogmusic to have this fixed prior to ordering their voyagers.

as another person here suggested it's a bit of a pain to use the CP-251's lag feature to remedy this. it would be interesting to have a list of additional modifications that could be done on the voyager even at an additional cost. i would certainly ask for filter-tracking-glide, sawtooth lfo, cv/gate outputs and balanced outputs.

yannis
8)

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:38 pm

Well, CV/Gate outputs at least can be remedied by throwing more money at it via purchasing the VX351.

Sawtooth LFO doesn't really bother me, but the Filter/Glide bug bothers me more every day.

-Hoax

FlowerP
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:51 am
Location: Sweden

Post by FlowerP » Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:58 am

When this thread was active last month, one forum member (I won't say who right now) posted here saying he had been under some sort of NDA, but was now able to acknowledge the existence of an official fix to the VFC/Portamento problem. I happened to read that post. A few hours later, when checking for new posts, I found that post had been removed. Strange...

Anyone have comments on this?

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Sat Sep 18, 2004 1:35 am

I find this very interesting, FlowerP.

I'm sure we all would like to find a solution to the glide problem. It would make an already-great synth absolutely stellar.

My guess is thuswise:

Imagine you work for a small company. You find a way to fix a problem, but your boss hasn't had time to review it with his boss, who hasn't had time to contemplate local zoning laws, file an environmental impact statement, and so on.

Now say somebody posts that "hey - this guy knows how to fix it and will do it for every single one of us" in a public forum.

Do you leave it active and incur a massive flood from owners who want the problem fixed, call attention to yourself, and get fired for trying to do the right thing?

Or do you find a way to delete the post?

Just a theory.

-Hoax

Arpmoogscience
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:44 am

Post by Arpmoogscience » Sat Sep 18, 2004 12:13 pm

MC posted that. he had his fixed.
I find it hard to believe that moog wont take care of these problems.
I need to send mine in at some point to have the noise problem
fixed and will have the glide problem fixed when I do even if I have to pay.
I do think it sucks but i have faith moog will come through.

Cruel Hoax
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:44 am

Post by Cruel Hoax » Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:57 am

They've got to do it.

It would give an almost-perfect synth that final push to legendary grandeur!

Well, make us happier, at least.

-Hoax

Post Reply