Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:08 pm
Step sequences for each patch would be great.
However I would be more than happy with a single, global sh-101 style sequence. Both fun and still useful - and surely much easier to add to the OS. I would be surprised if there is room to store one with each patch.
The sh101's sequencer is very fun and would make a great addition to the LP. Yes, an external computer/hardware sequencer can do more. But a built-in simple step sequencer is a great classic monosynth feature.
And we do want a modern classic, right?
However I would be more than happy with a single, global sh-101 style sequence. Both fun and still useful - and surely much easier to add to the OS. I would be surprised if there is room to store one with each patch.
The sh101's sequencer is very fun and would make a great addition to the LP. Yes, an external computer/hardware sequencer can do more. But a built-in simple step sequencer is a great classic monosynth feature.
And we do want a modern classic, right?