Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:14 am
To me, flanging seems like the inverse of phasing...I know they're very similar in concept & how they operate. Are they both delay based??
I use the Boss Phaser as well as the Moog Phaser and they are vastly different. The Moog is WAAAYYY more mellow and liquidy and less noisy. But the Boss is real aggressive sounding, the sweeps grind right through your headroom, and your bedroom (if thats where you play, like me..
... I play a Rhodes through em & sometimes my bass. Also the Boss Phaser does some things that sound digital, but VERRY spacey and cosmic. I don't think there's a 'best' phaser out there, just different ones. After reading lots of great reviews, I tried Vermona's phaser & though it was wack; unresponsive, too soft, no umph!...I like some aggressiveness in a phaser but with the ability to tone it way down to a very soft, barely noticeable effect that just hints that its there.
NEvertheless, the moogerfoogers ARE really more long-term pedals, in my view, with regard to discovering their best uses for your music. It took me about 6 months before I started liking the ring mod, but once I liked it I loved it!!! I like the Moog phaser right now, but I don't LOVE it yet...its been 6 months since I've had it...

I use the Boss Phaser as well as the Moog Phaser and they are vastly different. The Moog is WAAAYYY more mellow and liquidy and less noisy. But the Boss is real aggressive sounding, the sweeps grind right through your headroom, and your bedroom (if thats where you play, like me..

NEvertheless, the moogerfoogers ARE really more long-term pedals, in my view, with regard to discovering their best uses for your music. It took me about 6 months before I started liking the ring mod, but once I liked it I loved it!!! I like the Moog phaser right now, but I don't LOVE it yet...its been 6 months since I've had it...
