Watch out Moog!

In a Moog Mood? Here's a forum for discussion of general Moog topics.
EricK
Posts: 6010
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 2:09 pm

Re: Watch out Moog!

Post by EricK » Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:30 am

Heres the Founder of Roland demonstrating it its actually pretty amusing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmAr8dZgAAs

Heres another one thats pretty interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJlLiU9eFC4&NR=1


This is nice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUSYeBiZ ... re=related
Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://moogfoundation.org/do-something-2/donate/

I think I hear the mothership coming.

Cole Gaskins
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 9:44 pm
Location: Marshville NC

Re: Watch out Moog!

Post by Cole Gaskins » Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:22 pm


anoteoftruth
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Edmonton, AB
Contact:

Re: Watch out Moog!

Post by anoteoftruth » Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:54 pm

That last video did not impress me in the least haha.
Moog Voyager RME / Moog LP SE 2 / Nord Rack 1 / Microkorg / Korg ER-1 / Triggerfinger / Rocktron Banshee talk box / Ableton live / Guru / Lots of non-electric musical instruments.

moremagic
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:34 am

Re: Watch out Moog!

Post by moremagic » Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:43 pm

eXode wrote:
Mr Arkadin wrote:Here's the problem: unlike analogue, VA can always be improved - until perhaps you reach a point where they are indistinguishable. So 15-year-old VA technology is not good because many things can still be improved. Are you really telling my a JP-8000 sounds analogue? Sorry but Roland's COSM is not good. You want modelling? Then people like Sonic|Core and GForce do it better. Just hire those people will you Roland?
You read in a lot more into my post than what is actually there. I haven't said anything about VA technology at all. My post wasn't even directed at you (see the quote), I was reffering to the comment about rehasing and how I found it funny (and still do).

Please explain how one can interpret that as a debate over VA?
Because there are reasons that a 15 y.o. VA will sound like crap compared to a new one, while a 40 y.o. modular is the same technology as most parts of modulars made today. This seemed like what he was saying to me, at least

eXode
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 4:48 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Watch out Moog!

Post by eXode » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:24 am

moremagic wrote:Because there are reasons that a 15 y.o. VA will sound like crap compared to a new one, while a 40 y.o. modular is the same technology as most parts of modulars made today. This seemed like what he was saying to me, at least
Yes but like I explained that wasn't anything I commented on.

I COMMENTED ON THE ACTUAL CONCEPT OF REHASHING, WITHOUT ANY VALUES REGARDING THE KIND OF TECHNOLOGY BEING REHASHED.

Is that so hard to understand? I wasn't weighing in any values over different technologies and that's why I responded in the first place. The reponse I got from Mr Arkadin to my original post was that he thought that I seemed to suggest that a JP8000 sounds as good or better than discrete components, I have never suggested such a thing. See my answer a couple of lines above in bold capitals if it's still not clear to you.

I thought that given the nature of the OP, people could understand sarcasm when they see it. Apparently I was dead wrong.

Post Reply