Polyphonic Moog Feature Request

superd2112 · Post by **superd2112** » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:55 pm

superd2112 wrote:Replacing my original post here with a HUGE "Thank You" to Admin! SO glad to see that the troll exterminator has finally arrived!

Looks like I spoke too soon. Doh!

Subtronik · Post by **Subtronik** » Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:01 pm

Thank goodness for natural selection.

Subtronik · Post by **Subtronik** » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:04 am

Just Me · Post by **Just Me** » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:27 am

Ala mode is with ice cream and a scale is where you see the result of too much Ala mode.
I'd also like to hear the swollen head Mozart's enlightened noise. (If he can play anything other than a Swinette.)

ARP · Post by **ARP** » Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:36 pm

It would be nice if Moog would comment on this, even a hint that they are considering it. Being that it won't be cheap, it might motivate some folks to start $aving now , if they do it as nice as the Taurus III,Voyager, LP, it will certainly be a must have .

peterkadar · Post by **peterkadar** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:46 am

ARP wrote:It would be nice if Moog would comment on this, even a hint that they are considering it. Being that it won't be cheap, it might motivate some folks to start $aving now , if they do it as nice as the Taurus III,Voyager, LP, it will certainly be a must have .

Agreed. I can't help thinking that there must have been some discussion over the last few years. Perhaps especially moreso now since it seems we're all kinda thinking of the same thing. Sorta like the 'interconnectedness of all things'.

Of course, when you look at the polls, it looks like a relatively small number of people have actually participated... what is it, less than 50? But still... I'd love to hear someone from Moog weigh in on this, at least as far as they think it feasible or not.

HB3 · Post by **HB3** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:24 am

I would suggest that it would be much more likely they would speak up if they simply thought it wasn't feasible, so as to tamp down expectation. To me, their silence suggests they're actually working on it, or at least considering it.

anoteoftruth · Post by **anoteoftruth** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:35 am

HB3 wrote:I would suggest that it would be much more likely they would speak up if they simply thought it wasn't feasible, so as to tamp down expectation. To me, their silence suggests they're actually working on it, or at least considering it.

Considering some of Amos's posts on other forums... I'd say it's safe to assume they have something in the works. As to how far that is away is another story altogether. But it makes me feel happy inside that at least they have something in mind.

Christopher Winkels · Post by **Christopher Winkels** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:41 am

I'm sure there's also an aspect of wanting to avoid the Osborne Effect (assuming there is something in the works).

latigid on · Post by **latigid on** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:14 am

ikazlar · Post by **ikazlar** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:20 am

anoteoftruth wrote:
HB3 wrote:I would suggest that it would be much more likely they would speak up if they simply thought it wasn't feasible, so as to tamp down expectation. To me, their silence suggests they're actually working on it, or at least considering it.

Considering some of Amos's posts on other forums... I'd say it's safe to assume they have something in the works. As to how far that is away is another story altogether. But it makes me feel happy inside that at least they have something in mind.

Someone reported back from the Messe that Moog is working on something really nice. Let's see... I hope it's a BIG poly.

peterkadar · Post by **peterkadar** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:30 pm

[quote="ikazlarSomeone reported back from the Messe that Moog is working on something really nice. Let's see... I hope it's a BIG poly.[/quote]

do you have any more info or links about this?

Sir Nose · Post by **Sir Nose** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:37 pm

I read the post too. I can't remember the forum or Amos's handle there, but it was not slightly implied or hinted at. It was pretty much stated that a poly was being worked on. Coming to fruition is yet another step beyond.

anoteoftruth · Post by **anoteoftruth** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:40 pm

Sir Nose wrote:but it was not slightly implied or hinted at. It was pretty much stated that a poly was being worked on.

Well if it was "stated" that a poly was being worked on.. that seems enough of a "slight" hint to me... seeing as how we're talking about wether or not a poly is being worked on. haha.

dr_floyd · Post by **dr_floyd** » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:05 pm

Yes, it was strongly implied there was poly work being done.

And again, with the 6 Moog filter board already designed and used in the Moog guitar, which also might contain 6 VCAs, the engineering could already be in place to start a 6 voice poly.

Other features:
1. Multi-timbral - so if it's 6 voices, then it can be 6 entirely different voice programs simultaneously, with an alternating mode similar to the Oberheim Expander or the Yamaha TX.
2. Alternate tunings - in addition to standard multi-cultural scales, the possibility of any pitch for any note. Upside down keyboard a la Zawinul, etc.
3. CV i/o for VCO, VCF, VCA, keyb,mods, etc. Basically similar to Voyager.
4. Simple step sequencer and arpeggiator.
5. Maybe have a Murf built right in, you know, next to the touch pad/ribbon controller
6. Compact enough to be carried under one arm.

Moog Music Forum

Polyphonic Moog Feature Request

Would you buy a Polyphonic Moog?

Re: Polyphonic Moog Feature Request