So I looked into the Sumo 300, and it seems to be incredible! And cheap. (You can even still get one refurb from the factory for about $250... I wonder if that should make me nervous.) It seems to fit the bill for most of my requirements...
...for Don, who asked what those requirements were:
1.) I can't spend more than $500. I'm relying on newer second-hand, refurbished, or my friend's Guitar Center discount, most likely.
2.) The smaller and lighter and/or more portable the better. The Barbetta turned me on because of the huge power-weight ratio (it weighs only 44 lbs). The Sumo, while heavier, has casters and a built-in dolly. THAT is awesome.
3.) Of course! Input capacity has been a main point of consideration. Relatively few amps have as many inputs as I need, and I've also considered a mixer-to-amp or powered monitor combination for that reason. So far, The Roland KC350/550, Barbetta Sona 41, and Sumo 300 are the only standalone amps I've found that supply 4 channels, stereo or otherwise. I often include percussion in my live rig also, so at least one XLR input is nice too.
4.) I guess I'd have to say I agree... for electric piano I like mids that can really bark in the upper range when driven but are more mellow in the low range. For synths, I like warm basses that can still level walls in a pinch, and balanced highs that cut evenly, say, for filter sweeps and stuff. And a touch of reverb on everything -- especially the strings of the Opus, which are just sublime.
That's my primary reason for an effects loop. Roland doesn't have one. Barbetta does. Alesis doesn't, BUT has onboard effects. With a mixer, it's aux send/return. The stereo capability is awfully tasty too...
Btw, this is TOTALLY off topic... but Christopher, are you related to a Clint Boylan?
"There's a reason digital audio has earned its reputation for sterility, lifelessness, and harshness. Mainly, it's because it tends to be sterile, lifeless, and harsh." [url=http://www.myspace.com/froghollowdaycamp]Frog Hollow Day Camp[/url]