How about a LP rack version
- frestrobbe
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:30 am
How about a LP rack version
I wonder how many people would like a rack version (with some CV I/O's on the front) of the Little Phatty to be available?
I sure wouldn't mind, I still have some empty rack space
I sure wouldn't mind, I still have some empty rack space
Minimoog Voyager Electric Blue, Etherwave plus, MF-101, MF-102, MF-103, VX-351, CP-251
Re: How about a LP rack version
I call it a Voyager RME....so no thanks...
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:57 am
Re: How about a LP rack version
With comprehensive CV I/O then absolutely (it would presumably be quite a bit cheaper than the Voyager RME, and still all I need). Without the CV I/O, or with very limited CV options, much less interested.
Re: How about a LP rack version
I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all
Re: How about a LP rack version
+1 with four voices per module!JWaltman wrote:I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all
Little Phatty Stage II #3602, MoogerFooger CP-251 #1785
MF-103 12 Stage Phaser #6093, MF-104m Analog Delay #0301
--
My band: www.facebook.com/InstantMorning
MF-103 12 Stage Phaser #6093, MF-104m Analog Delay #0301
--
My band: www.facebook.com/InstantMorning
Re: How about a LP rack version
I voted yes on a LPRME, but not without knobs.
Support the Bob Moog Foundation:
https://moogfoundation.org/do-something-2/donate/
I think I hear the mothership coming.
https://moogfoundation.org/do-something-2/donate/
I think I hear the mothership coming.
Re: How about a LP rack version
I think a 'rack' Lp (or in a nice wood case) would be a welcome addition,
but understand it probably isn't simply a matter of parts >> case. There would
have to be a certain amount of engineering to pull it off well, and I doubt there's
much development time for it.
I would like to see cv jacks, etc.on the front though.
but understand it probably isn't simply a matter of parts >> case. There would
have to be a certain amount of engineering to pull it off well, and I doubt there's
much development time for it.
I would like to see cv jacks, etc.on the front though.
Voyager PE/ Frostwave Fatcontroller Seq./ Korg Dw-8000/Little Phatty Tribute #188/Korg EX-8000/KP3-Kaoss Pad/ EH Deluxe Memory Man delay effect/Peavy KB-100 amp
Re: How about a LP rack version
Or, maybe a modular approach.. Rack + 1 voice cardridge for 700, room for 3 more cardridges for 250 a piece... Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.jamezdd73 wrote:+1 with four voices per module!JWaltman wrote:I'd be happy with a voice expander module without any knobs at all
Re: How about a LP rack version
That'd be awesome, I'd love to be able to poly-fy my LP without the need for extra cables and stuff.JWaltman wrote:Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.
Little Phatty Stage II #3602, MoogerFooger CP-251 #1785
MF-103 12 Stage Phaser #6093, MF-104m Analog Delay #0301
--
My band: www.facebook.com/InstantMorning
MF-103 12 Stage Phaser #6093, MF-104m Analog Delay #0301
--
My band: www.facebook.com/InstantMorning
Re: How about a LP rack version
I'd love to see a rack and/or desktop version of the LP. Extra CV would be great but wouldn't mind if it only came with standard as well.
- frestrobbe
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:30 am
Re: How about a LP rack version
A rack LP with option to expand polyphony internally would be brilliant, if it's technically possible.JWaltman wrote:jamezdd73 wrote:
Or, maybe a modular approach.. Rack + 1 voice cardridge for 700, room for 3 more cardridges for 250 a piece... Or even better, room enough inside the phatty for extra voice boards.
Minimoog Voyager Electric Blue, Etherwave plus, MF-101, MF-102, MF-103, VX-351, CP-251
Re: How about a LP rack version
i am sure Rudi Linhard wouldn´t mind helping with the design and programming...
Re: How about a LP rack version
While the Voyager RME is fantastic and already exists, I agree completely that a LP RME would definitely fill a cool niche in the product line, especially if they could find a way to swing it for ~$1k. I'm certain they could probably simplify the interface and electronics down into a 3 space rackmount. Adding a polychain feature would be fun too.
Honestly though, right now I think there are bigger ideas afoot. This may need to be put on the back burner until we get the next big announcement...
Honestly though, right now I think there are bigger ideas afoot. This may need to be put on the back burner until we get the next big announcement...
www.ctrlshft.com
Re: How about a LP rack version
I'd be happy with a rackmount voice expansion module with no knobs, no menu, no screen... just cheap additional voices to control from the LP.
http://www.chvad.com
http://www.totsland.net
http://www.thequalia.com
http://www.wtiirecords.com
http://www.darksonus.com
http://www.totsland.net
http://www.thequalia.com
http://www.wtiirecords.com
http://www.darksonus.com
Re: How about a LP rack version
Yes, definitely useful, especially to get to some polyphony without having LP keyboards all over the place.
MUCH more interesting would be something like a LP 4/5-voice rack to get a five or 6 voice LP, especially if the price for a four-voice would stay around 3500€.
Don't know if that is possible, but from my view affordable polyphony is the next key step for Moog, this way or another.
MUCH more interesting would be something like a LP 4/5-voice rack to get a five or 6 voice LP, especially if the price for a four-voice would stay around 3500€.
Don't know if that is possible, but from my view affordable polyphony is the next key step for Moog, this way or another.