Single voice Moog One model

Polyphonic Analog Synthesizer
Post Reply
User avatar
MRNUTTY
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 2:54 pm

Single voice Moog One model

Post by MRNUTTY » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:47 pm

Now that folks have heard the synth, Would the voice quality alone be worth the basis of a monophonic Moog One?

I know, I know... after all this time waiting for a poly - why angst about mono? Just curious... having grown up with the studio polys of the 70’s and 80’s, and then a long sparse string of mono’s before polys became popular again, yeah I wonder :-)
VoyagerEB, Minitaur, LittlePhattyII, 4xSlimPhatty, Sub37, MF[2x101,2x102,103,104M,105,105B,105M,2x107,108M], 3xCP251, XV351, MP201;
Virus C; SuperNova; Micro-Q, MicrowaveXT; Kronos; Eventide H3000, GTR4000, H8000FW, 5xH9; 2xLexicon300L; 2xKSP8, K2500; EX5

User avatar
till
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:17 pm
Location: south-west Germany
Contact:

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by till » Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:05 am

The voice board is not the most expensive part of a synth. The panel of the Moog One is quite expensive to produce with all the knobs. So a monophonic synth with the same UI would cost way to much.
keep on turning these Moog knobs

Sequence:
Prodigy * Minimoog (1979) * Voyager * MF102 * MF103 * MF104z * MP201 * Taurus 3 * Minitaur * Sub Phatty * MF105 * Minimoog reissues with MUSEs * One

User avatar
ummagumma
Posts: 376
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:37 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by ummagumma » Wed Aug 28, 2019 5:55 pm

plus, what would they call it?

"Moog One" is already taken :D

maybe "Moog Only One of One" ?

User avatar
MC
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:20 pm
Location: Secluded Tranquil Country

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by MC » Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:26 pm

Moog 0.0625, or Moog 1/16
Gear list: '04 Saturn Ion, John Deere X300 tractor, ganged set of seven reel mowers for 3 acres of lawn, herd of sheep for backup lawn mowers, two tiger cats for mouse population control Oh you meant MUSIC gear Oops I hit the 255 character limi

User avatar
bichuelo
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Bogotá, Colombia
Contact:

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by bichuelo » Thu Aug 29, 2019 6:01 am

Semiquaver, maybe? It is the same as a 1/16th note
http://audiotecna.info
T-III, Voyager, VX-351, Slim Phatty, Model D, Sub Phatty, Subsequent 37, Minitaur, all moogerfoogers and minifoogers, EW+, Theremini, Model 15, Filtatron, Animoog, Model D App, iOS 11 Mother-32, DFAM, Werkstatt, Win7, High Sierra

User avatar
_DemonDan_
Posts: 1249
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:52 pm

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by _DemonDan_ » Thu Aug 29, 2019 2:13 pm

bichuelo wrote:
Thu Aug 29, 2019 6:01 am
Semiquaver, maybe? It is the same as a 1/16th note
Clever!
_ :twisted: _DemonDan_ :twisted: _

noisebit
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:45 am
Location: Germany, NRW

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by noisebit » Fri Aug 30, 2019 2:59 am

till wrote:
Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:05 am
The voice board is not the most expensive part of a synth. The panel of the Moog One is quite expensive to produce with all the knobs. So a monophonic synth with the same UI would cost way to much.
Till, I guess.

A simple theory...
if all the parts in both models are unique and there would be voice cards
in 16 slots, and the 8 slots in the 8 voice MO are empty...

Let´s calculate the street price in Germany:
A 16 voice MO actually costs 8.699 €
The 8 voice MO actually costs 6.699 €.
That means, that 8 voices costs 2000.- € (250 € each voice).
A MO without voices costs - by that calculation, 4.699 €. :shock:
Add one Voice, so the price could be 4.949 € for a one voice MO.

If this would be real, would pay the price for a MO one voice model? :?:

User avatar
stiiiiiiive
Posts: 2239
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Single voice Moog One model

Post by stiiiiiiive » Fri Aug 30, 2019 7:31 am

It's not that simple.
Just one point that makes it different: the Eur4699 cover R&D for The One but R&D for the "Son of the one" would be much lighter, hence cheaper.

Post Reply