Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
ahh nice example, i see. thank you! yes i’ve seen from some of the demo patches how useful it is to create really dynamic sounds that work across several octaves.
___________________________________________________
LP Stage II, LE Sub37
LP Stage II, LE Sub37
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
Another interesting Transform would be Quantize
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 2:59 am
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
It would indeed be great to have slewing transforms. But, these would also be great: waveshaping transforms!
Say we get "sine", "triangle", "square", and possibly other some more esoteric curves as transforms. Then, doing them on a downward sawtooth LFO will enable us to have different LFO waveforms per individual mod destination! How cool would that be?
I also second the modulation mixing options like Korg's AMS, Kurzweil's FUN, or Modifiers on Waldorfs. Though that would need to be a new page somewhere, it shouldn't be a Transform directly, methinks.
Say we get "sine", "triangle", "square", and possibly other some more esoteric curves as transforms. Then, doing them on a downward sawtooth LFO will enable us to have different LFO waveforms per individual mod destination! How cool would that be?
I also second the modulation mixing options like Korg's AMS, Kurzweil's FUN, or Modifiers on Waldorfs. Though that would need to be a new page somewhere, it shouldn't be a Transform directly, methinks.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:45 pm
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
INVERT.
- _DemonDan_
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:52 pm
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
Hi iandaviddunlop,iandaviddunlop wrote:INVERT.
The depth parameters in the Mod Matrix are bi-polar and typically go from -300% to +300%.
Using any negative value will already invert the control Source.
_ _DemonDan_ _
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 12:45 pm
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
Got it. Thanks!_DemonDan_ wrote:Hi iandaviddunlop,iandaviddunlop wrote:INVERT.
The depth parameters in the Mod Matrix are bi-polar and typically go from -300% to +300%.
Using any negative value will already invert the control Source.
Re: Moog One TRANSFORM Requests
+1 on Slew/Lag/etc. with the addition of having lag curves (log,exp,lin) as it would allow replication of traditional glide functions, but also allowing us to get loads of 'curves' from the existing modulation sources.
I'd also like other static scaling functions, and thinking of a similar list to edit curves in a good-quality DAW - sine or 'S-Curve' (as in the one that looks like a saturation curve), lin, log, and variants.
Variable 'bit' stepping functions could be nice as well, allowing otherwise subtle mod to jump out a bit. In other words, could choose the 'chunkiness' of steps from very big to nearly smooth.
Half and full-wave rect would be handy in some cases.
Perhaps something like 'invert on end of cycle'? Could get bipolar modulation out of the envelopes...
I could think of others, but it gets pretty esoteric (i.e. derivative / integrator )
I'd also like other static scaling functions, and thinking of a similar list to edit curves in a good-quality DAW - sine or 'S-Curve' (as in the one that looks like a saturation curve), lin, log, and variants.
Variable 'bit' stepping functions could be nice as well, allowing otherwise subtle mod to jump out a bit. In other words, could choose the 'chunkiness' of steps from very big to nearly smooth.
Half and full-wave rect would be handy in some cases.
Perhaps something like 'invert on end of cycle'? Could get bipolar modulation out of the envelopes...
I could think of others, but it gets pretty esoteric (i.e. derivative / integrator )