I think setting a minimum variance other than zero makes no sense - or better: can be achieved already.
What does it mean?
Settings between 0 and 10c (max) means that the range for the random pitch shift is between 0 and +10, so some notes get no pitch correction.
Supposed settings for variance between e.g. 5c (min) and 15c (max) should be equal to a constant pitch shift of 5c, combined with a pitch shift of -10c for the second oscillator (the 2nd one gets always the same amount of the pitch correction, but negative) AND setting the variance between 0 and 10 at the same time.
I also would say that a parameter display and improving the alphanumerical input (for giving names more smoothly) are far more important features and candidates for a next update.
cheers,
Bernard
Sub 37 Osc Variance
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:14 pm
Re: Sub 37 Osc Variance
I don't really see that as must-have either. Might be interesting, but I think the majority of users would use it rarely, if ever.bernard wrote:I think setting a minimum variance other than zero makes no sense - or better: can be achieved already.
What does it mean?
Settings between 0 and 10c (max) means that the range for the random pitch shift is between 0 and +10, so some notes get no pitch correction.
Supposed settings for variance between e.g. 5c (min) and 15c (max) should be equal to a constant pitch shift of 5c, combined with a pitch shift of -10c for the second oscillator (the 2nd one gets always the same amount of the pitch correction, but negative) AND setting the variance between 0 and 10 at the same time.
I also would say that a parameter display and improving the alphanumerical input (for giving names more smoothly) are far more important features and candidates for a next update.
cheers,
Bernard
Re: Sub 37 Osc Variance
Yeah, I agree parameter display is more important...forgot about that one.
Re: Sub 37 Osc Variance
There are things I believe more important as well (velocity curves). My comment was not meant to address prioritization of our collective wish lists.
If I remember correctly there was a different thread a while back that did attempt to ascertain the popularity of features on the wish list.
If I remember correctly there was a different thread a while back that did attempt to ascertain the popularity of features on the wish list.