Page 1 of 1

"unintended PWM"

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:05 am
by miczac
Hi,
in an article of a German magazine, when talking about design issues of vintage gear, which sometimes led to today's hyped character of a particular instrument:
The author tried to give an example and he casually mentioned an "unintended PWM on the VCOs of the Moog modulars".
Alas he wasn't specific enough to name a model number of the synth or module or such.
Anyone knows what he's probably talking about?
Thanks - Michael.

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:12 pm
by noddyspuncture
Well it can only be either the early 901's or the later 921's... Moog Modulars only use those... and my bet is it's the 901...:)

Cheeerz
Tom

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:46 pm
by miczac
yeah, but what's the issue?

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:41 pm
by EricK
Maybe tell us exactly which article you read this in so that anyone with technical knowledge who can help you knows the exact context of the statement.

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:20 pm
by miczac
In German Synmag the author tried to give an example for a "happy accident" in synth design and he casually mentioned an "unintended PWM on the VCOs of the Moog modulars". Nothing more. It was merely a line, but it got my attention and I became curious.
I have no 901s or 921s, and the 901s I worked with were so heavily modified they probably wouldn't reveal such a thing. So I can't tell from experience.
But maybe it's just nonsense?
I'll try to get in touch with the author.

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:34 am
by EricK
Which issue?

Re: "unintended PWM"

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:20 am
by noddyspuncture
miczac wrote: and the 901s I worked with were so heavily modified they probably wouldn't reveal such a thing.
What were the 'modifications" if you don't mind me asking....?