Analog Vs Digital
Analog Vs Digital
In my experiences, I havce come across the fact that digital is way better than analog.
It is a cleaner signal that actually allows for mor modulation possibilities.
Just look at the MicroWave XT.... or any of the Roland workstations.
Each can "act" as a mono synth as well.
Please discuss.
It is a cleaner signal that actually allows for mor modulation possibilities.
Just look at the MicroWave XT.... or any of the Roland workstations.
Each can "act" as a mono synth as well.
Please discuss.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:57 am
This has been discussed to death, but...
"Better" can only be determined relative to a specific set of objectives and aesthetic values. Without specifying what kind of result you want your gear to achieve, and why, there's no way to answer the question.
And since musical style is very diverse (a good thing IMO), we shouldn't expect that everyone will share the same objectives and values. Which means that there can be no general answer to the question.
Many people seem to have a hard time accepting this, though, which is why the topic keeps coming up and never gets resolved (because it is in principle unresolvable).
FWIW, in my own music I find digital tools better suited to certain tasks and analog ones better suited to others. I couldn't say that one was better overall, even within my own needs...
"Better" can only be determined relative to a specific set of objectives and aesthetic values. Without specifying what kind of result you want your gear to achieve, and why, there's no way to answer the question.
And since musical style is very diverse (a good thing IMO), we shouldn't expect that everyone will share the same objectives and values. Which means that there can be no general answer to the question.
Many people seem to have a hard time accepting this, though, which is why the topic keeps coming up and never gets resolved (because it is in principle unresolvable).
FWIW, in my own music I find digital tools better suited to certain tasks and analog ones better suited to others. I couldn't say that one was better overall, even within my own needs...
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:01 pm
- Location: Burlington, VT
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:43 am
Re: Analog Vs Digital
Yep, you're right. Now go away you cock.PureDigital86586770 wrote:In my experiences, I havce come across the fact that digital is way better than analog.
It is a cleaner signal that actually allows for mor modulation possibilities.
Just look at the MicroWave XT.... or any of the Roland workstations.
http://soundcloud.com/luke-antony
In the event that you aren't a troll, I can offer you this:
Digital is like a player piano. It plays all the right notes, in all the right places, with all the right values. The playing is clean, no doubt, but some might argue that it's "too clean," too sterile, it has no soul.
Analog is like a person playing the same song. They also play all the right notes, in all the right places, with all the right values. However since they're not a machine, their playing has a certain ineffable feel to it, a human quality that is not imparted by the player piano. It's not as clean as the player piano, but that doesn't mean that it can't be pleasurable to listen to nevertheless.
Musically speaking, the decision as to which one is better than the other comes down to whoever it is doing the listening. It's an aesthetic decision.
In the end, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Digital is like a player piano. It plays all the right notes, in all the right places, with all the right values. The playing is clean, no doubt, but some might argue that it's "too clean," too sterile, it has no soul.
Analog is like a person playing the same song. They also play all the right notes, in all the right places, with all the right values. However since they're not a machine, their playing has a certain ineffable feel to it, a human quality that is not imparted by the player piano. It's not as clean as the player piano, but that doesn't mean that it can't be pleasurable to listen to nevertheless.
Musically speaking, the decision as to which one is better than the other comes down to whoever it is doing the listening. It's an aesthetic decision.
In the end, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
-
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:44 pm
I will also comment hoping this is not troll feeding.
I have keyboards at two extremes, a Korg M3 and a Moog Voyager (along with Moogerfoogers, CP-251 and expander for the Voyager).
The primary reason I have a Voyager is because of control voltages. The Korg M3 has a very sophisticated system of modulation but you still can do with it what you can with control voltages. The sky is the limit with CVs. You can feed them into modules in a modular, Moogerfoogers, you can even use DIY electronics. Digital synthesizers do one thing, run programs.
Every digital synth is simply a computer with limited operating system (in some cases a scaled down and specialized windows) running a program. Whatever that program allows you do do is all you are going to be able to do.
Computers also have to break up time into descrete parts. I am convinced that some of the itnteractions of analogue circuits can be duplicated because of this. Try creating a good self oscillating filter with a computer program. Analogue electronics add color which is not a bad thing. It's why certain synths have been so popular, just consider the Moog ladder filter for example.
I think filters are also diffrent. I don't like the filters of the Korg M3 at all. The are thin and harsh although the sounds of the M3 itself are very beautiful but that has a lot to do with how carefully Korg constructed them.
Bottom line is that I love both off my synthesizers. I don't see one as bettter than the other, only different and in many ways, they complement one another.
I have keyboards at two extremes, a Korg M3 and a Moog Voyager (along with Moogerfoogers, CP-251 and expander for the Voyager).
The primary reason I have a Voyager is because of control voltages. The Korg M3 has a very sophisticated system of modulation but you still can do with it what you can with control voltages. The sky is the limit with CVs. You can feed them into modules in a modular, Moogerfoogers, you can even use DIY electronics. Digital synthesizers do one thing, run programs.
Every digital synth is simply a computer with limited operating system (in some cases a scaled down and specialized windows) running a program. Whatever that program allows you do do is all you are going to be able to do.
Computers also have to break up time into descrete parts. I am convinced that some of the itnteractions of analogue circuits can be duplicated because of this. Try creating a good self oscillating filter with a computer program. Analogue electronics add color which is not a bad thing. It's why certain synths have been so popular, just consider the Moog ladder filter for example.
I think filters are also diffrent. I don't like the filters of the Korg M3 at all. The are thin and harsh although the sounds of the M3 itself are very beautiful but that has a lot to do with how carefully Korg constructed them.
Bottom line is that I love both off my synthesizers. I don't see one as bettter than the other, only different and in many ways, they complement one another.
- Portamental
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:53 am
Delete this thread, please.
OP is a first-poster and he is spouting trollbait. He should be banned.
OP is a first-poster and he is spouting trollbait. He should be banned.
Gear list: '04 Saturn Ion, John Deere X300 tractor, ganged set of seven reel mowers for 3 acres of lawn, herd of sheep for backup lawn mowers, two tiger cats for mouse population control Oh you meant MUSIC gear Oops I hit the 255 character limi
- Christopher Winkels
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:23 am
- Contact:
- latigid on
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:47 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: Analog Vs Digital
Or the Waldorf Microwave I... oh wait, that has 8 analog filters.PureDigital86586770 wrote: Just look at the MicroWave XT.... or
Well the Pulse......no that has an analog "Moog" type ladder filter.
But my Miniworks 4 pole.....nope that has the same analog filter as the pulse.
OK, the Q+...........What, 16 analog filters?
Perhaps using Waldorf as an example wasn't the best idea for the "digital is better" troll bait?