2nd Clue

In a Moog Mood? Here's a forum for discussion of general Moog topics.
martin
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by martin » Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:46 am

Orbiter is the coolest name for a synth ever.

User avatar
Rogue
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:47 am
Location: FL
Contact:

Post by Rogue » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:19 am

EricK wrote:Perhaps its a Moog Phaser.
Afterall they already have been pioneering the Alien Technology for over 40 years.
It does look like a gun... :lol:

IT looks mostly like a funky side panel for a funky synth. So maybe IT's not "just another" analog synth, but has some funky feature to IT? Most of which have already been discussed. So not just a "cheap monosynth," but something added in there to make IT special.

But instead of funky, should I say, "hip?" :wink:

Orbiter is a cool name, agreed...
[url=http://www.myspace.com/spceco][img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v375/garbageboxlove/motion/star_pulse-1.gif[/img] [b]Shine on down...[/b][/url]

Micahel Victor
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Pennsylvania home of the Slinky
Contact:

Post by Micahel Victor » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:47 am

Thanks martin
Thinking in evolutionary terms Orbiter seemed to be the next step from Voyager .Okay clue number one has smoke in the backround representing a lift off.
in the clue#2 all of the wood side panels look as if they are orbiting the blue ball in the center
hence my guess Orbiter.As an updated name for Sattelite.
My mothers maiden name is martin.
"Oh that thing" "I had nothing to
do with that. "as said to me by
R.A.MOOG
When asked to sign my xeroxed moog source users manual.Then signed it.

dylan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:58 pm

speculation

Post by dylan » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:34 am

i hope this puts to rest the keytar business, hard to imagine this as a keytar "silhouette" as some as have speculated. assuming it IS the side panel of a keyboard, the 'upper back' seems quite steeply sloped for inputs (CV, MIDI, Audio?) but the back of the base has a "screw/bolt/connector" at the far end suggesting that this area might not be only for support purposes, but might be the logical spot for ins/outs. Could the proposed "Orbiter" (that is catchy..) have a built-in sequencer and still fall in the "affordable" category so many of us are praying for? A sequencer synth with CV outs and/or ext LFO IN would sure work nicely with the moogerfooger line.

gd
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 12:28 am
Location: Canada

Post by gd » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:09 pm

I still think it will be along the lines of the Future Retro Revolution.
Mini D, P'08 ..

monads
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:34 pm
Location: voyagerland
Contact:

Post by monads » Wed Mar 15, 2006 12:17 pm

sir_dss wrote:Is it going to be too expensive and everyone is going to be all pissy about it?

I'll be keeping my MMV regardless.
Price is hovering around the $1000-1300 to compete with the DSI mono I believe. But I have no plans to let go of my voyager either

miditerranean
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:28 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by miditerranean » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:11 pm

Maybe the new synth (if that's what it is) has a fixed-panel knob section unlike the minimoogs. I'm guessing that the new synthesizer is a smaller monophonic one like the micromoog.

martin
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by martin » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:27 pm

The Mini Model B had a fixed panel. Maybe it is designed like that?

Arpmoogscience
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 10:44 am

Post by Arpmoogscience » Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:42 pm

I hope it a sequencer along the lines of the Arp 1613.

johnll
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: New England, USA

Post by johnll » Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:16 pm

godzilla wrote:strange how the back slopes down, implies that it will look really funky IMO,
and that maybe it won't have a huge range of CV I/O. i don't know i might be wrong (hope i am) but I just can't imagine plugging lots of things into the back of a boomerang like that.
I wonder about that too. The curve on what appears to be the back seems a bit deep to put a lot of I/O jacks in. Unless it is filled in in some way, and the back of the case makes a kind of dark "C" shape in the gap.

reptar
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Melbourne AU
Contact:

Post by reptar » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:16 pm

I think the actual metal case will be square, and just the wood will be curved. Kind of like the sidepanel of the MPC2500.
Last edited by reptar on Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

tunedLow
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 2:46 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Post by tunedLow » Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:11 am

Hey Reptar, good to see you around these parts. Are you going Moog?

reptar
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:51 am
Location: Melbourne AU
Contact:

Post by reptar » Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:40 am

Depends on how this will stack up against the MEK. I'll be kind of tempted seeing as I already have the tabletop evolver, so it would be nice to have both.

writeroxie
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Post by writeroxie » Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:52 pm

maybe something like this...

Image

or this...

Image

???

sir_dss
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: CAL LE FOR NE YA

Post by sir_dss » Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:48 pm

You know...

It's is starting to look like a Taurus reissue.

Post Reply