More homebrew stuff seems fitting on your intended system.

It is your baby, however.
Interesting choises and configuration. So you decided against the acrylic for the multi-module? Nontheless, it has that "Doc Brown" sort of feel to it with the labeling (Marty's stereo......hey thats what you can call it lol).Voltor07 wrote:I'm looking at the module chart, as I brought it to work with me, and I have decided on a new module chart. It will be as follows.
*Ahem*.Top cabinet: Q141/Q106/Q112/Q141/Q106/Q112/Q141/Q106/Q112/MultiModule
Bottom cabinet:Q104/Q105/Q109/Q109/Q107/MMF/Q108/Q113/Q124/Q111/Q147/Q171/Q172/Q110
MMF=MiniMoog Filter
Basically, it's two modulars in a single 32 space cabinet.
As a cost saving measure, yes I did. An acrylic panel, pre-etched, was going to cost a couple hundred.EricK wrote: Interesting choises and configuration. So you decided against the acrylic for the multi-module?
I have the Q137 in back already. And yes, it's in the back. I'm buying one expensive module per pay period as I can afford it, ie oscs and the quantizer and quantizer aid. The cheaper modules I'm buying two or three at a time. I did buy the Q137 and Q110 together, so I have the noise taken care of.EricK wrote:Sounds like you are doing what I started to...wanting to cram it full of great modules but forgetting the power interface panels (have to put that damn switch in the back I guess).
EricK wrote:I can understand someone like myself who can't solder buying a simple module like that out of necessity, but not you.
More homebrew stuff seems fitting on your intended system.
It is your baby, however.
The compatibility is a huge issue. The old Moog modulars ran on +/- 12V. Also, they had edge connectors. The main thing is: how many Moog modulars are left? Can't be that many. I think that Moog, IMHO, would be better off making modules for the newer systems, in terms of sales volume.Goom wrote:Getting back to the original subject in this thread - something to consider is that there are probably a fair number of Moog modular owners that would love to add new modules to their system. I'm sure there are systems that are missing a few modules, and probably many modular owners with only a few Moog modules that would like to expand their selection. Then, there are the owner's of modern modulars that would love to have the "real deal".
A potential bump in the road would be power and signal level implementation. Should new Moog modules conform to the newer modular standards (+/-15V power with +/-5V signal levels), or would it be best to adhere to the vintage specification, to make it easier to interface with vintage Moog systems? The types of connectors is an issue as well. I don't think any of the new companies are using the edge cards for connecting the modules.
Moog could make their module work on +/- 12 volts dc, for retro compatibility, and add switchable 7812 and 7912 voltage regulators onboard for when installing them in modern systems that supply +/- 15 volts dc.Voltor07 wrote:The compatibility is a huge issue. The old Moog modulars ran on +/- 12V. Also, they had edge connectors. The main thing is: how many Moog modulars are left? Can't be that many. I think that Moog, IMHO, would be better off making modules for the newer systems, in terms of sales volume.
True, on all accounts. It is sad story.thealien666 wrote:
Moog could make their module work on +/- 12 volts dc, for retro compatibility, and add switchable 7812 and 7912 voltage regulators onboard for when installing them in modern systems that supply +/- 15 volts dc.
They could also design the boards so that they could still plug in old Moog system sockets, while providing connectors for modern ones, too.
They could do all that if they wanted to... But obviously they don't want to.