sample and hold

In a Moog Mood? Here's a forum for discussion of general Moog topics.
Post Reply
dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

sample and hold

Post by dan thacker » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:04 am

I'm still pretty new at analogue stuff and I was wondering if temperature can effect the way this feature behaves,i.e:less tones bouncing around when it's cold , [sorry for the description,I don't know how else to describe it.]

User avatar
thealien666
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: sample and hold

Post by thealien666 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:52 am

Usually no.

If you're talking about the LP/SP, I would suspect possibly the DAC circuit that could be offset by temparature, since the S&H in LP/SP is digital and has to be converted to analog control voltage by the DAC. But generally, this sort of circuit has a precise voltage reference, and is temperature compensated internally. But not having the schematics and not knowing precisely what chip Moog used as their DAC, I'm not sure of anything. All I know for certain, is that the S&H is digital in LP/SP and analog in Voyager.

What's the difference? The digital one operates in software and generates a random number in memory that is later converted into an analog control voltage by a Digital to Analog Converter (DAC). The other samples a microsecond of voltage coming out of a white noise generator, holds it in a capacitor until the next pulse from the LFO arrives. That voltage is then used as a control voltage.
Moog Minimoog D (1975)
DSI OB6
DSI Prophet REV2
Oberheim Matrix-6
Ensoniq SQ-80
Korg DW8000
Behringer DeepMind 12
Alesis Ion

dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: sample and hold

Post by dan thacker » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:18 pm

Thanks Al,that is odd that the s&h in my LP sounds different than it did when I saved the preset,given that it's digital.Kind of sluggish,oh well ,sh*t happens with lots o' circuits!Oh yeah,that a/d converter,is that where the "noise" is generated also for the LP? I've also heard the LFO is digital.

User avatar
thealien666
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: sample and hold

Post by thealien666 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:49 pm

dan thacker wrote:Thanks Al,that is odd that the s&h in my LP sounds different than it did when I saved the preset,given that it's digital.Kind of sluggish,oh well ,sh*t happens with lots o' circuits!Oh yeah,that a/d converter,is that where the "noise" is generated also for the LP? I've also heard the LFO is digital.
BTW, I'm not so sure anymore about the LFO and S&H being digital. I don't have the schematics and, if I'm relying on what I've read recently about the Phattys, according to Moog, they took some of the circuit designs from the Voyager and shrunked them using SMD components (smaller ICs). So the LFO, and S&H might be analog after all... Maybe Amos could tell us...

But I'm still intrigued by the term "sluggish" you use to describe the behavior of the random sample/hold of your LP ? Do you mean that the changes are not abrupt and seem to "glide" from one value to the next ? Or do you mean that the intensity (range) of the steps is not as high as when it's warmed-up ? Or if the speed of the changes seems slower when the unit is cold ?
Moog Minimoog D (1975)
DSI OB6
DSI Prophet REV2
Oberheim Matrix-6
Ensoniq SQ-80
Korg DW8000
Behringer DeepMind 12
Alesis Ion

User avatar
muksys
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:05 am
Contact:

Re: sample and hold

Post by muksys » Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:54 pm

thealien666 wrote:the LFO, and S&H might be analog after all
I am almost 100% the LFO is analog. It is part of the "RAC" control, as stated in the manual. As for the S&H, that I am not too sure. It would seem to me to be digital since the only way to access it is through the menu structure.

User avatar
Portamental
Posts: 888
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:53 am

Re: sample and hold

Post by Portamental » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:35 pm

It does not matter if the S&H is analog or digital. It is stable. However, if it is used to modulate a temperature sensitive circuit like VCO's, then there will be a temperature side-effect. Vintage Moogs are well known for requiring a rather long warm-up time. Much less so with the Voyager.

At any rate, we are talking cents here. Since S&H generate random signals (unknown pitch), I would be very much surprised if you could hear the difference between a cold and a warm machine.

dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: sample and hold

Post by dan thacker » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:23 pm

Sorry AL,I just read your question:When I said "sluggish",I meant that the s&h tones were slower and less animated [ I use the latter adjective with trepidation],but I didn't want to say "b*uncy" again!!

User avatar
thealien666
Posts: 2791
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Re: sample and hold

Post by thealien666 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:23 am

dan thacker wrote:Sorry AL,I just read your question:When I said "sluggish",I meant that the s&h tones were slower and less animated [ I use the latter adjective with trepidation],but I didn't want to say "b*uncy" again!!
The speed of the S&H is set by the LFO. And since the LFO is most likely analog, it is very possible that the "sluggish" speed at which steps are changing in the S&H when your LP is cold might be due to a cold LFO oscillator not warmed-up, yes.
Moog Minimoog D (1975)
DSI OB6
DSI Prophet REV2
Oberheim Matrix-6
Ensoniq SQ-80
Korg DW8000
Behringer DeepMind 12
Alesis Ion

dan thacker
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: sample and hold

Post by dan thacker » Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:56 pm

Now that it's not -40 degrees,it is sounding great.
I know once the thing is paid off,[two more payments,] it will sound even better!

Post Reply