yeah

yeah

hi,
my opinion is the same … WHAT’s GOING ON?
I’m an happy owner of several moog products, but now…I want more.

I’m lost in the moog strategy, like you willy.

For me, until moog will have not poly synth or modules for a real modular system, the catalog will stay uncomplete.

But I still believe in the moog compagny and I hope they will hear us…

And a Phatty RME will be a very good thing too :smiley:

A new polysynth should be in their cards, although, I have to say this: I’d prefer they do one combining the strengths of the Apollo/Polymoog and the Memorymoog Plus – in an Apollo/Polymoog style chassis.

~Ben

Moog reissued the Taurus because the requests have been increasing since at least 2004. They had at least two polls during that time regarding Taurus.

Moog has been doing april fool pranks since 2005. I enjoy them. We humans have a concept called humor which is sometimes difficult for other species to understand. I recommend listening to early Bill Cosby or Monty Python as a primer.

Modulars? I think the total modulars built by moog in the years 1966-1983 are less than 300. Even by 1972 they were built to order by the custom shop because the demand shifted from modulars to minimoogs. Today it would not make economic sense for Moog to release a modular. One look at the price for a System 55 from Modusonics.com will tell you why.

Polyphonic - there’s an interesting problem. One camp wants a bare bones poly at less than $2000, the other camp wants features that compete with the Andromeda. Frankly you can’t satisfy both parties. No one knows what plans Moog has but when Bob was around he said they could build a polyphonic but they’re not going to. That meant that the economics and market don’t justify the project. Progress does progress though and there have been components recently available that could facilitate a reasonable polyphonic. Frankly I don’t think it will be cheap but I would be very interested in a product.

Quoted for truth. :smiley:

It may be heresy, but DSI have made a very good synth by using digitally generated LFOs and envelopes, while keeping the actual audio path 100% analog. Nobody would complain that the LFO’s aren’t fast enough, or that the env’s aren’t snappy enough.

Perhaps Moog could take a similar approach to keep costs down while still maintaining the classic Moog sound. That, and adopting the interface from the LP might make it more feasible.

Thoughts???

I believe the LFOs in the Taurus and maybe LP are digital, as they can be sync’d to MIDI and tap tempo. So yes, probably an LF-DCO in there.

I guess with digital EGs you risk stepping ( ?)

The LFO’s are digital in the LP, but not so sure of the ones in the Taurus. Anything’s possible…