will any of the features in the sub-37 ported to a firmware update for the sub-phatty
im thinking Features that are well in reach because they share the hardware implementation with the 37 For instance envelope latching and lfo to noise level.
ehm maybye some xtra preset banks (more of a request)
I don’t know about new features, but presets are all over the web. I have some already… maybe if Amos asks for them I’ll share!
I’m responsible for the IC Presets BTW!
I’m really wondering if paraphonic mode will be considered for the Sub phatty. considering the oscillators are digitally controlled I don’t see why this wouldn’t be possible… would sure be nice
.. before jumping to the highest bidder. i meant more like modulating routing, filter feedback and maybye add delay to lfo mod. to both synths )
i would be extremely surprised if the paraphonic is secretly already implemented in the sub
And for me the first usefull upgrade is MORE patches storage! 16 is a shame in the 21st century…
I’d really enjoy having an arpeggiator or simple sequencer on it.
They make a synth more fun to play when it’s by itself.
mm according to the sub 37 manual feedback is a hardware implementation. for the rest the strucuture of both subs is the same. so paraphonicmight be possible yees/ double the presets. appregiator maybye through the editor ?
appreciator
ps something else i would love to see is free assign of cv to midi (like in the minitaur). Also i dont understand why moog did not opt for assigning cc’s to the regular midi standard of cutoff 74 resonance 75 etc..)
sub phatty is rad!
a ssuggestion for adding 5 times the presets:
Bank + octave ( -2 -1 0 1 2 )
every bank-octave is a bank with 5 presets
Hi All,
It is my understanding that the Sub Phatty does not have the hardware necessary to create paraphonic duophony.
[edited to remove incorrect quote. Sorry, an3.]
please do not change my quotes:
an3 wrote: I would be extremely surprised if the paraphonic is [isn’t] secretly already implemented in the sub.
I never wrote [isn’t] .. cause i dont expect it to be possible !
tnX
Ah.. I get it now.
We both don’t expect it to be possible.
Sorry, an3. [Have corrected above.]
no problem. ) tnx
If the Sub Phatty can’t support paraphony because of hardware limitations, then my next vote would go to variance, like implemented on the Sub37 1.1.0 firmware.