Of course there will be! The reason I say this is because Amos said, on the release of 2.00, that there were some things they didn’t have time to implement, and there were other things that had not yet been suggested. That, and the fact that they are working on an update as we speak. Moog is just awesome like that. ![]()
Mmmmm, step sequenced analog bass goodness. Yes, please! ![]()
Sorry, but I think, this is an unnecessary thing for a monophone synth in 2009…
Maybe it is comfortable on the stage, but it is difficult programming in the little led display.
I think the arpeggiator is a cool thing, but elaborate to handle too.
A lof of more important functions are not in the LP, why a step seq?
![]()
God yes please Amos let us have a sequencer!
It’s one thing I’ve been dying for but haven’t found the perfect solution.
One of these might work well for you if ya can’t wait. ![]()
And let us not forget the DIY’s Voice of Saturn! ![]()
I just use a genoQs Nemo for my Voyager : http://www.moogmusic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6218
Me too…but with my modular and my LP!
I absolutely love my Nemo. ![]()
gets better every week I learn enough!
I’m hoping for a clock>out from the LP arpeg if anything.
0-12v?
The LP wants ±5 though right?
I’d like for a hardware sequencer that I don’t have to buy the CP-251 or cost $1000, but isn’t as small as the Step64 with its most of its functionality hidden between multiple keypresses or holding buttons on powerup. The VOS is only 10 step but won’t gate.
Man.. it goes on & on. Moog should just put one out in CP format already!
Why did they discontinue the mobius?
Is there a conspiracy not to have a cheap sequencer or something?
Why did they discontinue the mobius?
Is there a conspiracy not to have a cheap sequencer or something?
Yes…yes there is. ![]()
i bought a cheap mac (under$200) on craigslist just so i can use Numerology ( www.five12.com ). add a midi to USB for a few bucks and you have THE best step sequencer there is. no questions.
Numerology. its by far the best.
and the demo version is free and very useful
I use my Mac also for sequencing and recording my songs…but i still like it when i can make music without looking at a screen and just use my ears and a simple hardware interface…that’s what i found in a Nemo step sequencer.
I use my Mac also for sequencing and recording my songs…but i still like it when i can make music without looking at a screen and just use my ears and a simple hardware interface…that’s what i found in a Nemo step sequencer.
found a nemo step sequencer ?! wow these things look even more expensive than the LP. but it looks really cool and interesting.
found a nemo step sequencer ?! wow these things look even more expensive than the LP. but it looks really cool and interesting.
You kind find more info and my experience in this thread about it : http://www.moogmusic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6218
Step sequences for each patch would be great.
However I would be more than happy with a single, global sh-101 style sequence. Both fun and still useful - and surely much easier to add to the OS. I would be surprised if there is room to store one with each patch.
The sh101’s sequencer is very fun and would make a great addition to the LP. Yes, an external computer/hardware sequencer can do more. But a built-in simple step sequencer is a great classic monosynth feature.
And we do want a modern classic, right? ![]()
anyone here mess with running this program into a little phatty?
i really need to buy this program.
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2011/03/29/m185-software-step-sequencer-for-mac-windows/