Moog announced a “Stage Edition” (due out in the summer) which will be a cheaper version of the LP. It will lose the wood end caps and have a different illumination scheme, but should otherwise be the same instrument (there are no specs on the Stage Edition at present).
Selling the Mini to buy the LP is a tough choice, but if the two sound the same to your ears, buy the LP. You will be getting a synth that’s highly comparible to the Mini, with the advantages of variable waveforms, ADSR EG’s, MIDI and CV connections, and patch storage. Add to that, it’s brand new, with a waranty and full factory support, and it is a genuine Moog instrument from the man himself: Bob Moog.
I am afraid that someday, my beloved Model D is going to go south on me, and it is nice to have a back-up. Talking to the folks at Analogue Haven, they indicated that some of the old vintage synths are just starting to wear out due to age. Not many people around who can fix them, and probably expensive.
The LP will depreciate a bit after I “drive it from the showroom”, while a working Mini continues to appreciate. Selling the Mini for an LP does not make good business sense, if the decision is based on that. I know that I am still kicking myself for selling my ARP 2600 for $650 in the late 80’s, when it would fetch thousands now… all to buy an EMU Orchestral sample module (which is worth about $100 now).
And yes–I love the look of the LP…plus the fact that it is my favorite brand–MOOG! Will I like the cheaper edition as well with it’s watered down looks???
By the way, has the cheaper edition truly been announced? The guy at Analogue Haven indicated that it was unsubstantiated rumor…
The Voyager is probably the instrument that I need but it is so expensive–particularly when I already have a Mini.
And to be honest, is the MEK a better buy? It is cheaper and has more functions. Just not a Moog…
Well enough agonizing for now and back to work so that maybe I can buy both…
I previously wrote the Phatty did not have a velocity sensing keyboard, but it DOES.
And according to the recent Keyboard magazine article, “The sound engine is the same as the Voyager. It has the same oscillator, the same filter (with a few less options), and the standard LFO.” from Cyril Lance, the new Bob.
Don’t sell the Model D… I am selling my Arp Axxe to help get my LP, but never a Model D.. One thing to consider is that they JUST started making the LP and based on how fricken kool it is, they will be making it for a while.
They havent made model D’s since the year I was born ( 83, yes I’m a kid) and they won’t ever again !!!
It cant be in that bad of condition. Get on Kevin Lightners waiting list, have him do it up, put lit wheels in it and sell it on ebay to some german kid for 5000.00 (it has been done) and buy BOTH !!! Muhahahahah…
The Stage Edition was announced, and will be produced after the initial run of Tribute Edition LP’s. I have no knowledge of exactly when the Stage Edition will be available, although it will probably be sometime over the summer.
The MEK is the keyboard version of the Evolver laptop. The Evolver is a digital/analog hybrid synth, with two analog and two digital oscillators (4 oscillators total). It has it’s own sound (I own one). Pricewise, the MEK probably compares to the Stage Edition LP. Performance-wise, the MEK a different beast altogether. while it has more features than the LP (more oscillators, a built-in sequencer, two filters, delay FX), it’s not a true analog synth, does not have the Moog filter, the cool vibe, etc. Does the feature set make the MEK a better buy? That’s a decision for you to make. For now, I’d suggest saving your money (and your Model D) and checking out both instruments when they become available (hopefully you can do a side-by-side comparison in a music store).
Because of the price difference, obviously there are going to be sacrifices in the LP as opposed to the Voyager. It’s got some great features and I know it sounds great. 2 Oscillators is plenty for a fat sound because the Mini had to use the 3rd Osc for LFO. It survived with 2 oscillators as did the source and the Multimoog(which i regret getting rid of because of its modulation).The Little Phatty has a seperate LFO.
I know it may have lost 7 notes on the bottom, but as you can control this from another keyboard and an up and down octave, your range is no longer limited.
Everyone has griped about the name, but it’s here, it’s alive and it’s getting it’s boots on ready to kick lumps out of the other market contenders.
I’m looking forward to seeing one in the flesh as soon as I can. What about the flightcase though. It’s like a voyager with rigamortis
We’ll have to keep posts on the board about companies across the world that custom build to suit the Little Phatty.
My only concern with the LP as opposed to the Voyager is the lack of dedicated knobs for each function. It’s really nice to be able to just grab a parameter and instantly make a change. But who knows, it might not be that big a deal once a person gets accustomed to it. The Voyager just seems so much more the real deal.
I’m betting that the LP, despite having only 4 knobs, will be an improment on the Voyager as far as having real knobs/pots versus the Voyager’s rotary encoders. In my experience this can make all the difference in terms of the “feel” of a synth. For people used to playing older Moogs, I think the LP will have more of the classic Moog feel and that will translate into it’s overall playability.
The Voyager controls feel very solid and are very well built, of course, but theres no substitute for direct analog control over parameters. The Little Phatty will be even more “the real deal,” if that’s possible.
