eric: "Its NEVER too late to learn something "
I beg to differ. I am a sport coach (and a coaching theorist), and I respectfully beg to TOTALLY differ.
Somebody who is posting on a moog website and who asks about 3500 usd synth programming,
is certainly not a kid nor a teenager. He probably is at leat in his 30s.
Either he has already some musical capacity, or IT IS too late for him to acquire manual dexterity (Jarrett chubby fingers are… ahem… a metaphor. His hands can be chubbier than wakeman’s, but the man has definitely some HUGE hand-ear coordination, not to mention artistical skills).
As for “synth programming being an objective task”, well…
Yes. Proviso you don’t mistake quantification for objectivity.
A moog filter is a moog filter, an open filter is an open filter. A specific filter will self-oscillate at a specifc setting. This is objective. And quantifiable.
But.
wether thousands and thousands of ugly presets in the last Yamaha or Korg do-it-all workstation are ART, good art, good music, or just plain shit…
… well, that is not quantifiable.
The judgement about those presets may be objective in a wide philosophical sense (I, for example, think that Beethoven is good for objective reasons, non just according to my own personal judgement, but it would take a lot of discussion to support that - and I wouldn’t extend that kinf of judgement on a single tool - like a mass-produced synth preset is),
but that doesn’t mean “good for everybody”, nor it means “reproducible or transmissible by standard measurement”.
In simpler terms, ther’s no such thing as
—> creating sounds as painting by numbers.
I’d like to be more specific but I don’t think a forum is the correct place.
Boy, is this discussion becoming serious…