EricK,
Yes, you are right. Learning to use the Etherwave theremin with the FreqBox definitely takes some study and trying different things out. I have a long way to go in this respect but I did try it in a live performance setting recently, and you can check out some video of that here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lWK4oQnhF4
I have been thinking about getting the CP-251, and I will try out your theremin + Sample & Hold 251 suggestion, when I do get one.
I know what you mean about the MicroMoog being a powerful synth in and of itself. It has a killer tone and a big rich full sound. And you are right that synths like it and the Rogue don’t get their proper credit as great synths. I have had my Rogue since 1984 (and have used it on dozens of albums) and it still sounds great with no noticeable deterioration cosmetically or functionally. It is indeed true as you have pointed out that sometimes less is more.
That being said, the Voyager RME is certainly a sufficient synth and a powerful gnarly beast. I have gotten some crazy sounds where the oscillators are frequency modulating each other - absolutely astounding.
During our recent Analog Synthesizer Ensemble session K. Paul Boyev (Otolathe) controlled his RME with a Frostwave spaceBEAM via the VX-352.
Another possibility that has occurred to me is that I could control the RME with the Rogue via the 352 using the Rogue’s Keyboard CV Out jack and Trig/Gate Out jack.
And you are absolutely right about the theremin + Moog MF-104Z analog delay. I can’t imagine the theremin without the MF-104. And of course the 102 Ring Mod sounds good in there too.
Your question about whether the operating system and digitality of the Voyager will shorten its lifespan is a question that a lot of people have pondered I am sure. We see comments about these kinds of issues every day here on the Mooger Forum. I am a little suspicious (and this is especially true of myself) that some of us might be suffereing from a kind of ill-founded Luddite paranoia about the digital features of the Voyager and Little Phatty. On another forum I read people saying that the Voyager OS throws 20 years of technological advances out the window. Hahahaha. While ancient and revered beasts like the Rogue and MicroMoog have served us well, synths like the Voyager and Phatty are probably more “reasonable”, because they give the modern synth user more options. Let’s face it, we live in a digitized world - and there’s no going back.
There is a big part of me that screamed in horror at the very idea of an analog synth with presets! OMG. We didn’t need any frickin presets back in the day - we just winged it into outer space. And this prejudice is the very thing which kept me from falling in love with my Voyager RME for such a long time. When I saw the Voyager OS t-shirt with the words “Presets Are For The Weak”, I laughed myself silly. As I have said elsewhere, I never ever use the presets on my RME - except for one that I have created myself so that I can have the MW Buss turned on when I am not using a MIDI keyboard. There are tons of features that I have not yet used, hidden in the menus of the RME. But why complain about having too much? Slowly, bit by bit, I am trying new things - such as selecting different filter poles.
Oh, I have an idea for a Moog t-shirt, with a pic of the RME on the front:
KEYBOARDS ARE FOR THE WEAK
Then again, I have also considered getting the Phatty Stage II and using it to control the RME - that way I would have a 5-oscillator synth set-up.
Yes, I do indeed ahave a MySpace page:
http://www.myspace.com/halmcgee
The first song in my MySpace player, “Zone Of Alienation”, is a new one on which I used the RME.
Cheers,
Hal