Go to the home page, click on “Little Phatty” on the product banner
I just got the release notice from Moog.
So did I! Very interseting looking little synth.
It is beautiful bold and ballsy looking .
I’ll wager it sounds Phatter than it looks.
Hello,
User interface sleek, but not too minimal. Looks ergonomic and well designed. Nice one, Moog!
Regards,
LWG
wow. that looks tasty.
Holy crap, its beautiful. 
I LOVE IT!
Look at Bob’s sig on the back… So classic.
What a great tribute!
I can’t wait to hear about the history of the design from Mike Adams.
What is up with the back panel anyway.
I mean it looks nice with a facsimile of the great ones signature but shouldn’t it open up or something.seems like wasted space to me.
Moog will initially release a special, limited edition run of 1,200 individually numbered Bob Moog Tribute Edition synths.
If he were here today would he approve?
Or would he again say:
It’s interesting that Axel Hartmann was involved in the design. He was the mind behind many Waldorf products like the Q. The things that can happen when great minds get together!
I’ve heard the LP and all I can say is that Little Phatty doesn’t do the sound justice. It’s AMAZING!! 
The pic is way too huge, so here’s the link to a high res pic with closeup of the panel
http://www.analogindustries.com/images/blog/LittlePhatty_huge.jpg
Everything is incredible except - (no disrespect intended or implied…) that I don’t care for the name at all (sorry).
I hope they bring out a tabletop/rack version.
Holy CRAP! That thing looks GREAT!!! 
Are the wheel illuminated, or is that an opaque thing going on?
Yes! The wheels are illluminated. I think the name is cool, considering Moog hummor. Mike Adams is right, it is sort of tounge and check. 
One by one, all the “little phatty is a joke” people will come around.
I can’t WAIT to order one. Hot damn, I need this magical analog object.
not to be a party-pooper, but i wonder what the NON-limited edition (performance) models will look like and cost (a little less?)
not to wreck the party…but it’s kinda ugly…and they did end up keeping that terrible name…
what a shame…and i really really wanted one…like really bad…
totally didn’t live up to my expectations.
it’s not terrible though, i’ve seen worse…but what is the deal with all that EMPTY SPACE…give me some damn pictures or something (to make up for a lack of knobs)…maybe a little mock up signal path…with boxes and triangles that represent mixers and amplifiers…maybe a big ole pic of frequency vs gain for the filter ( i do see some sort of picture but they look like the head of a pin, a heck of alot smaller then the button)…i mean how hard is it to add some graphic art, I like a lil bit of descriptive clutter…
ya know?
and for being a completely analog signal path it looks so…so…digital…
eh, maybe i will end up getting it…maybe not…
I’m so sad right now…
electrical_engineer_gEEk: whatever the new Moog synth was in your fantasies: find some dudes, garage space and make it yourself. You can be CEO.
The new Moog synth had to look like SOMETHING. If it was exactly your cup of tea, some other complainer would have taken your post space to moan.
I think it looks fantastic. As for a “digital” look? When I think digital, I think big grey keyboards with 1 knob and a huge screen. The LP is a small, wood-cheeked synth with the Moog logo on it… not every scrap of space should have a graphic or control.
It’s called negative space, a design aesthetic. And the LP isn’t even that “clean” - it’s got loads of buttons, lights, knobs, I/O, et cetera. There’s just a little “air” above the knobs, which makes sense.
I understand everyone will react slightly different, but your beefs with the LP seem so… wrong? Maybe I just can’t stand to see you so sad after witnessing the LP’s first publicity shots. Cheer up, son, imagine running the output into a vintage tube amp.
-T