Moog Music Forum

J-Jul wrote:That's what I thought, I've got two ears.
And I want to have a home studio soon, so stereo is necessary.


Thanks for the answers, it's a pleasure to know about it all.

You'd be amazed how well 2 (functional) ears can hear a mono source…


Conflicting logic you have.

Yeah I mean why would they bother?

I would think that if one were to forge a signature on the Voyager it would be someone far more desirable???

I don't see why you'd even need a pair of monitors, its not like its a stereo instrument?

Thanks for your commitments to the community, your contributions haven't gone unappreciated.

Sure but if all you want is a filter to run stuff through, there are definitely cheaper/smaller options for a standalone filter module.

How is $1700 "too cheap" for one extra VCO and a slightly larger keyboard? When it says Moog on it. 8) Seriously though the differences in specs between your proposed price point instrument and the Voyager, IMHO would be difficult for a consumer to justify the expense of a Voyager..., thi...

From a business standpoint, why would Moog make a drastically cheaper Voyager competitor and Little Phatty snuffer, especially at the same time?

All finished, passed it off to its new owner (my long term friend/musical partner), he loved it. I got it overall pretty clean, not funky anymore. Restored cosmetically, electronically, and redid the keybed...plays very nice now. Peeled the stupid formica stuff off and gave it a nice milky green pai...

Its not so much worn away as it is just kind of dirty, like the rest of the keyboard was before I cleaned it. I was able to make some headway on it though, but still stands out compared to the mod wheel, which I got bright white...

In the process of restoring a Micromoog right now, and I don't know about you, but I personally don't like synths that I feel like I have to wash my hands after playing...so this one is getting a detailed job. Obviously of course, its not quite that easy. But standard when I restore a synth. My spec...

i was aware of their existence, it was " a preview of things to come. Talk amongst yourselves." line that i found intriguing. Probably just means that "we will be scanning and posting more random technical documents in the future", which to me is not terribly exciting... :roll:

EricK wrote:I would call a Fooger a guitar pedal look-alike.

Do a survey of Moogerfooger owners and tell me that there aren't more guitar players with them than keyboard players...

The Sub phatty (with a bigger keyboard) is the unit they should have released in the first place. But regarding a poly, some here are convinced that Moog is not going to make one and have made some compelling arguments, but I'm not convinced. Whatever new product is going to replace the phatty, I s...

Regardless, its got one leg out the door right now... And what ? It's missing a leg too ? :lol: just generated a shipping label for its new owner. Sold within a couple hours of posting. Fantastic. Seriously. Glad to see another Moog rescued from the claws of old age. :D Yup, going to a technician w...

I pulled the lid off so one could look at the innards...it does come with the lid. Really not in terrible shape, IMHO, just needs to be cleaned and repaired. Regardless, its got one leg out the door right now...just generated a shipping label for its new owner. Sold within a couple hours of posting.